DOJ-OGR-00019401.jpg
556 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
556 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 60, Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. The filing's primary argument is that Judge Nathan incorrectly refused to modify a protective order, which would have allowed Ms. Maxwell to share sealed material information with Judge Preska. The document outlines the structure of the legal brief, including the case history, jurisdictional statements, and the specific points of the argument.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned in an argument heading, stating they erred in a ruling.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Litigant/Party |
Mentioned as the person who should have been allowed to share information.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Mentioned as the intended recipient of information from Ms. Maxwell.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The district court | Judicial |
Mentioned in a heading stating it erred in a ruling.
|
| DOJ-OGR | Government Agency |
Appears as part of the Bates number in the document footer (DOJ-OGR-00019401).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
The document argues that Judge Nathan made an incorrect ruling ('erred') in a matter concerning Ms. Maxwell's ability to share information.
The document describes a request for Ms. Maxwell to be allowed to share information with Judge Preska, indicating they are involved in related legal proceedings.
Key Quotes (1)
"Judge Nathan erred in refusing to modify the protective order for the limited purpose of allowing Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal, material information"Source
— Author of the legal document
(This is the main heading for the 'Argument' section, outlining the central claim of the filing.)
DOJ-OGR-00019401.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,575 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page2 of 58
Table of Contents
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... i
Table of Authorities .............................................................................................................. iii
Statement of the Case and the Facts .................................................................................... 1
The indictment ................................................................................................................. 1
The civil case ................................................................................................................... 1
The subpoena .................................................................................................................... 2
The order declining to modify the criminal protective order...................................... 8
The appeals....................................................................................................................... 9
Jurisdictional Statement...................................................................................................... 10
Issue Presented .................................................................................................................... 22
Summary of the Argument.................................................................................................. 22
Argument ............................................................................................................................ 23
I. Judge Nathan erred in refusing to modify the protective order for the limited
purpose of allowing Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal,
material information [REDACTED] ................................................................................................................................. 23
A. Preservation and standard of review. .............................................................. 26
B. The district court erred in declining to modify the protective order.............. 26
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 33
Certificate of Compliance with Rule 32(A)................................................................. 35
Certificate of Service........................................................................................................ 35
Table of Authorities .............................................................................................................. iii
Statement of the Case and the Facts .................................................................................... 1
The indictment ................................................................................................................. 1
The civil case ................................................................................................................... 1
The subpoena .................................................................................................................... 2
The order declining to modify the criminal protective order...................................... 8
The appeals....................................................................................................................... 9
Jurisdictional Statement...................................................................................................... 10
Issue Presented .................................................................................................................... 22
Summary of the Argument.................................................................................................. 22
Argument ............................................................................................................................ 23
I. Judge Nathan erred in refusing to modify the protective order for the limited
purpose of allowing Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal,
material information [REDACTED] ................................................................................................................................. 23
A. Preservation and standard of review. .............................................................. 26
B. The district court erred in declining to modify the protective order.............. 26
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 33
Certificate of Compliance with Rule 32(A)................................................................. 35
Certificate of Service........................................................................................................ 35
i
DOJ-OGR-00019401
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document