DOJ-OGR-00016122.jpg
508 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
508 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge, Ms. Sternheim, and Ms. Comey. The parties are establishing the order for alternating peremptory strikes during jury selection. The judge decides that the defense will start and outlines the sequence of strikes, a method agreed upon by both the defense and the government.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript, discussing the procedure for jury strikes with the court and Ms. Comey.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the court transcript, making decisions on the procedure for jury strikes.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript, representing the government and agreeing to the proposed jury strike procedure.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as one of the parties in the legal case, represented by Ms. Comey.
|
| defense | Legal team |
Mentioned as one of the parties in the legal case.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion to determine the procedure for alternating peremptory strikes during jury selection.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied as the location of the court proceeding by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORT...
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Sternheim addresses the court to seek clarification on a legal procedure, demonstrating the typical interaction between an attorney and a judge.
Ms. Comey responds to the judge's question and addresses the judge as 'your Honor', indicating a formal, professional relationship within a court setting.
They are on opposing sides ('defense' and 'government') in a legal proceeding, discussing procedural matters with the judge, indicating they are opposing counsel.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think since the defense has ten, the defense should start."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's rationale for deciding which party begins the jury strikes.)
DOJ-OGR-00016122.jpg
Quote #1
"Okay. So the defense will do two; government is one; defense, two; government, one."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's final ruling on the sequence of alternating jury strikes.)
DOJ-OGR-00016122.jpg
Quote #2
"I've given into the requests of both sides to do it this way."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge indicating that the agreed-upon method is a concession to the attorneys' preferences.)
DOJ-OGR-00016122.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,208 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106
LBTVMAX1
1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
2 I just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating
3 strikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not
4 sure.
5 THE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the
6 defense should start.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till
8 we get to the one and one and one.
9 THE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?
10 MS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your
11 Honor.
12 THE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;
13 government is one; defense, two; government, one.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.
15 THE COURT: That's fine.
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.
17 THE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I
18 don't do alternating strikes.
19 MS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --
20 THE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides
21 to do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the
22 defense goes, or you could do what you proposed.
23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical
24 way.
25 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016122
LBTVMAX1
1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
2 I just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating
3 strikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not
4 sure.
5 THE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the
6 defense should start.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till
8 we get to the one and one and one.
9 THE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?
10 MS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your
11 Honor.
12 THE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;
13 government is one; defense, two; government, one.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.
15 THE COURT: That's fine.
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.
17 THE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I
18 don't do alternating strikes.
19 MS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --
20 THE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides
21 to do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the
22 defense goes, or you could do what you proposed.
23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical
24 way.
25 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016122
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document