DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg
414 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
414 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated March 20, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Edelstein. The Court questions the witness about a July 21 letter sent to the court, asking if her law firm would have voluntarily disclosed information about an investigation into 'Juror No. 1' without being prompted. The witness begins to affirm that they expected the information to eventually be revealed.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
Subject of the redirect examination, addressed as Ms. Edelstein by the Court.
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
An attorney present at the proceeding.
|
| Ms. Davis | Attorney |
An attorney present at the proceeding, attempting to ask a question.
|
| Ms. Brune |
A person to whom a question was previously put by the Court.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of an investigation mentioned in a July 21 letter.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, referred to as 'your Honor'.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
The person being questioned, identified as Edelstein.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
An investigation of Juror No. 1.
Relationships (3)
The Court is questioning Edelstein, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.
Mr. Schectman, an attorney, is questioning the witness, Edelstein.
Key Quotes (2)
"Ms. Edelstein, I want to put a question to you that I put to Ms. Brune. Focusing on the July 21 letter to the Court, would your law firm have disclosed the information set forth in that letter and the investigation of Juror No. 1 if the Court had not inquired or the government failed to raise the waiver issue?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is questioning the witness, Ms. Edelstein, about the disclosure of information related to a juror investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg
Quote #1
"I think by that point, I mean, I think yes, that we had thought that it would come out at some point during --"Source
— THE WITNESS
(The witness's response to the Court's question about disclosing information.)
DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,470 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00333-ABN Document 646-2 Filed 03/20/22 Page 272 of 330
A-5812
A-5812
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein - redirect
355
Edelstein - redirect
355
1 A. Yes.
2 THE COURT: Mr. Schectman?
3 MR. SCHECTMAN: And I take it because you thought it
4 was in conceivable that this was the same person.
5 THE WITNESS: That's right.
6 THE COURT: Anything further, Mr. Okula?
7 MR. OKULA: Nothing, thank you, your honor.
8 MS. DAVIS: Just one housekeeping matter, your Honor?
9 THE COURT: We don't need housekeeping.
10 MS. DAVIS: It's in regard to one of the exhibits we
11 want to move into evidence.
12 THE COURT: Let's complete the inquiry, Ms. Davis,
13 that's the way it proceeds. I have a few questions for the
14 witness.
15 MS. DAVIS: I apologize, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Ms. Edelstein, I want to put a question to
17 you that I put to Ms. Brune. Focusing on the July 21 letter to
18 the Court, would your law firm have disclosed the information
19 set forth in that letter and the investigation of Juror No. 1
20 if the Court had not inquired or the government failed to raise
21 the waiver issue?
22 THE WITNESS: I think by that point, I mean, I think
23 yes, that we had thought that it would come out at some point
24 during --
25 (Continued next page)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
2 THE COURT: Mr. Schectman?
3 MR. SCHECTMAN: And I take it because you thought it
4 was in conceivable that this was the same person.
5 THE WITNESS: That's right.
6 THE COURT: Anything further, Mr. Okula?
7 MR. OKULA: Nothing, thank you, your honor.
8 MS. DAVIS: Just one housekeeping matter, your Honor?
9 THE COURT: We don't need housekeeping.
10 MS. DAVIS: It's in regard to one of the exhibits we
11 want to move into evidence.
12 THE COURT: Let's complete the inquiry, Ms. Davis,
13 that's the way it proceeds. I have a few questions for the
14 witness.
15 MS. DAVIS: I apologize, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Ms. Edelstein, I want to put a question to
17 you that I put to Ms. Brune. Focusing on the July 21 letter to
18 the Court, would your law firm have disclosed the information
19 set forth in that letter and the investigation of Juror No. 1
20 if the Court had not inquired or the government failed to raise
21 the waiver issue?
22 THE WITNESS: I think by that point, I mean, I think
23 yes, that we had thought that it would come out at some point
24 during --
25 (Continued next page)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010095
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document