DOJ-OGR-00020064.jpg
643 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
643 KB
Summary
This legal document is a memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, stating that the court's previous decision to deny bail was correct because she remains a serious flight risk. The memorandum asserts that her new bail proposal is just a repackaging of old arguments and does not mitigate the risks posed by her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Defendant |
Named as the defendant in the case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- GHISLAINE MAXWELL. The document is a memorandum in o...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | government agency |
The court where the case is being heard.
|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecution (United States of America) submitting the memorandum.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-07-14
A bail hearing was held where the Court rejected the defendant's request to keep the record open.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2020-12-08
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, filed a renewed motion for release on bail, referred to as the 'Renewed Bail Motion'.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Ghislaine Maxwell
2020-12-18
The Government filed this memorandum in opposition to the defendant's renewed motion for release.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States District Court hearing the case.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a court filing in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, where the former is the plaintiff and the latter is the defendant.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,850 characters)
Case 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 100-2 Filed 12/18/20 Page 1 of 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------x
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-v.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant. :
------------------------------------------------------------------x
------------------------------------------------------------------x
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court. The defense now asks this Court to reverse that finding by
essentially repackaging its prior arguments and presenting a more specific bail package. However,
at the July 14, 2020 bail hearing in this case, this Court rejected the defendant’s request to keep
the record open to allow the defendant to do precisely what she has done here—namely, present
more detailed information about her finances and a more concrete package—determining that
further information about her financial picture would be irrelevant because no combination of
conditions could ensure this defendant’s appearance. The Court’s conclusion was plainly correct,
and the Renewed Bail Motion does nothing to undermine it. The offense conduct outlined in the
Indictment remains incredibly serious, the evidence against the defendant remains strong, and the
defendant continues to have extensive financial resources and foreign ties, as well as the
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court. The defense now asks this Court to reverse that finding by
essentially repackaging its prior arguments and presenting a more specific bail package. However,
at the July 14, 2020 bail hearing in this case, this Court rejected the defendant’s request to keep
the record open to allow the defendant to do precisely what she has done here—namely, present
more detailed information about her finances and a more concrete package—determining that
further information about her financial picture would be irrelevant because no combination of
conditions could ensure this defendant’s appearance. The Court’s conclusion was plainly correct,
and the Renewed Bail Motion does nothing to undermine it. The offense conduct outlined in the
Indictment remains incredibly serious, the evidence against the defendant remains strong, and the
defendant continues to have extensive financial resources and foreign ties, as well as the
1
DOJ-OGR-00020064
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document