This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge and attorneys Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Menninger regarding trial procedure. The key topics are the timing of an objection to a potential witness's testimony and the estimated length of the cross-examination for the current witness, Carolyn, with the judge emphasizing the need for efficiency to not waste the jury's time.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, raising a potential objection to witness testimony.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, estimating the length of his cross-examination.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Sternheim as the party that may call witnesses out of order.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"I could raise this now or we could hold off, but the government has indicated that they may call some witnesses out of order."Source
"I'm going to guess an hour, hour and a half, your Honor, something like that."Source
"Well, I don't want the jury to be sitting idly. So if it is going to happen in your cross, we should"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,387 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document