DOJ-OGR-00021704.jpg

661 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 661 KB
Summary

This document, a page from a legal filing dated June 29, 2023, outlines the statutory definitions of "sexually explicit conduct" and "sexual contact" under 18 U.S.C. § 3509. It cites the 2012 Ninth Circuit case, United States v. Carpenter, to establish that the legal definition of "sexual abuse" is broad, encompassing not only physical contact but also acts of persuasion, inducement, or coercion.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Carpenter Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101'.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Courts government agency
Mentioned as having looked to the definition of “sexual abuse” set forth in Section 3509(a).
United States government agency
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the case 'United States v. Carpenter'.
9th Cir. court
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which decided the case 'United States v. Carpenter' in 2012.
Congress government agency
Mentioned in reference to its use of the word “includes” in Section 3509(a)’s text.

Timeline (1 events)

2012
The legal case United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101, was decided by the 9th Circuit.
9th Cir.

Key Quotes (3)

"the intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify sexual desire of any person."
Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(9)(A) (The legal definition of the term “sexual contact”.)
DOJ-OGR-00021704.jpg
Quote #1
"We join our sister circuits in looking to subsection 3509(a) for a definition of ‘sexual abuse’ under federal law, and find it the appropriate definition to use in applying section 3283’s extended statute of limitations."
Source
— 9th Cir. in United States v. Carpenter (A quote from the court's opinion in the case United States v. Carpenter.)
DOJ-OGR-00021704.jpg
Quote #2
"the employment, use, persuasion, inducement, enticement, or coercion of a child to engage in, or assist another person to engage in,” sexual contact."
Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a) (Part of the definition of “sexual abuse” that extends beyond actual physical contact.)
DOJ-OGR-00021704.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,706 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page57 of 93
44
or coercion of a child to engage in, or assist another person to engage in, sexually explicit conduct or the rape, molestation, prostitution, or other form of sexual exploitation of children, or incest with children.
18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(8). The term “sexually explicit conduct” is in turn defined to mean, among other things, “sexual intercourse, including sexual contact”; and the term “sexual contact” means “the intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify sexual desire of any person.” Id. § 3509(a)(9)(A). Courts have looked to the definition of “sexual abuse” set forth in Section 3509(a) to determine whether the statute of limitations of Section 3283 applies to an offense. United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2012) (“We join our sister circuits in looking to subsection 3509(a) for a definition of ‘sexual abuse’ under federal law, and find it the appropriate definition to use in applying section 3283’s extended statute of limitations.”).
The definition of “sexual abuse” includes not only actual “sexual contact,” but also the “the employment, use, persuasion, inducement, enticement, or coercion of a child to engage in, or assist another person to engage in,” sexual contact. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a). The breadth of this definition is underscored by Congress’s use of the word “includes” in Section 3509(a)’s text, which is “significant because it makes clear that the examples enumerated in the text are intended to be
DOJ-OGR-00021704

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document