DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding the authentication of an exhibit related to 'Maxwell and Epstein'. The Court sustains an objection made by Ms. Comey, instructs the jury to disregard certain testimony, and reserves its final decision on admitting the exhibit until after hearing from a witness referred to as 'employee one'.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for the authentication of an exhibit.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on an objection and addressing Ms. Moe.
|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned as a potential owner of a document being discussed for authentication.
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as a potential owner of a document being discussed for authentication.
|
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Mentioned as having made an objection that the Court sustained.
|
| employee one | Witness |
A future witness whose testimony the Court will hear before ruling on the admission of an exhibit.
|
| Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the witness under direct examination.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments, to which the Court responds with rulings.
The document states that Ms. Comey made an objection which the Court sustained, a standard interaction between an attorney and a judge.
Key Quotes (2)
"The question before the Court is whether this witness can authenticate this exhibit as a document belonging to Maxwell and Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on his observations of the book."Source
— MS. MOE
(Framing the legal argument for how a witness can authenticate a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the jury to disregard that testimony. ... I may reserve until we hear the testimony of employee one."Source
— THE COURT
(Making a ruling on an objection and outlining the procedure for the potential admission of the exhibit.)
DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,334 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 194 of 228
LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct 870
LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct 870
1 be heard on this issue. I apologize.
2 MS. MOE: I'm sorry, your Honor.
3 Just to frame the issue, I recognize we've been
4 clarifying the record about time periods. Our view on
5 authentication for this exhibit is this witness is not
6 authenticating it as a document from a particular time period.
7 I recognize we've been asking questions about that.
8 The question before the Court is whether this witness
9 can authenticate this exhibit as a document belonging to
10 Maxwell and Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on
11 his observations of the book. So we just wanted to frame the
12 question in terms of our perspective.
13 THE COURT: That's fine. I didn't ask the question if
14 it was a later book. Ms. Comey did. There was an objection.
15 We thought we were on foundation. That's where we are.
16 I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the
17 jury to disregard that testimony. Then it's the defense's turn
18 to voir dire, you'll seek admission, I'll rule. I may admit
19 it, I may not admit it, I may reserve until we hear the
20 testimony of employee one.
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 (Continued on next page)
23
24
25
2 MS. MOE: I'm sorry, your Honor.
3 Just to frame the issue, I recognize we've been
4 clarifying the record about time periods. Our view on
5 authentication for this exhibit is this witness is not
6 authenticating it as a document from a particular time period.
7 I recognize we've been asking questions about that.
8 The question before the Court is whether this witness
9 can authenticate this exhibit as a document belonging to
10 Maxwell and Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on
11 his observations of the book. So we just wanted to frame the
12 question in terms of our perspective.
13 THE COURT: That's fine. I didn't ask the question if
14 it was a later book. Ms. Comey did. There was an objection.
15 We thought we were on foundation. That's where we are.
16 I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the
17 jury to disregard that testimony. Then it's the defense's turn
18 to voir dire, you'll seek admission, I'll rule. I may admit
19 it, I may not admit it, I may reserve until we hear the
20 testimony of employee one.
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 (Continued on next page)
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018067
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document