This document is a page from a legal charge (jury instruction) filed on August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines the legal theory of "aiding and abetting," explaining that a defendant, specifically named as Ms. Maxwell, can be convicted for assisting in a crime even if she did not physically commit it herself. The text provides definitions for key terms like "counsel," "induce," and "procure" to guide the jury's deliberation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a case where the theory of aiding and abetting is being explained, stating it's not nec...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of the prosecution's burden of proof: "it's not necessary for the government to show that Ms...
|
"aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures"Source
"To counsel"Source
"To induce"Source
"To procure"Source
"To cause"Source
"it's not necessary for the government to show that Ms. Maxwell herself physically committed the crime charged in order for you to find her guilty."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,682 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document