DOJ-OGR-00017245.jpg
624 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
624 KB
Summary
This legal document, a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, outlines allegations of overt acts in a conspiracy case. It describes how between 2001 and 2004, Epstein's employees sent gifts, including lingerie, to a woman named Carolyn and that Epstein, Maxwell, or employees called her to schedule massages for Epstein. The document concludes with a legal argument explaining that to convict Ms. Maxwell of conspiracy, the prosecution only needs to prove that any member of the conspiracy committed an overt act, not necessarily Maxwell herself.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the recipient of massages from Carolyn, and the person who caused a package to be sent to her. His emplo...
|
|
| Carolyn |
Recipient of gifts (including lingerie) and packages from Epstein's employees. She was called to schedule appointment...
|
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Subject of legal argument |
Mentioned as someone who may have called Carolyn to schedule appointments. The legal argument discusses the requireme...
|
| Epstein's employees | Employee |
Sent gifts to Carolyn and called her to schedule appointments to massage Epstein.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Express | company |
Used to send a package from Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida in October 2002.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that created the transcript.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2001-01-01 to 2004-12-31
Epstein's employees sent Carolyn gifts, including lingerie.
From Southern District of New York to Florida
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of an address from which gifts were sent to Carolyn.
|
|
|
Location of Carolyn's residence, where gifts and packages were sent.
|
|
|
Location of an address from which a package was sent to Carolyn.
|
Relationships (3)
Carolyn was called to provide massages for Epstein. Epstein's employees also sent her personal gifts, including lingerie.
Maxwell is mentioned alongside Epstein as someone who would call Carolyn to schedule appointments. The document discusses the legal requirements for proving Maxwell's role in a conspiracy.
The text explicitly refers to them as "Epstein's employees" who acted on his behalf.
Key Quotes (1)
"In order for government to satisfy this element, it's not necessary for the government to prove that Ms. Maxwell committed the overt act. It is sufficient for the government to show that any of the members of the conspiracy knowingly committed some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy."Source
— Unspecified Speaker (likely prosecutor or judge)
(Explaining the legal standard for proving an overt act in a conspiracy charge against Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00017245.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,581 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 224 of 257 3058
LCKCmax9
Charge
LCKCmax9
Charge
1 which she did.
2 Three, between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004,
3 Epstein's employees sent Carolyn gifts, including lingerie from
4 an address in the Southern District of New York to Carolyn's
5 residence in Florida. For example, on one occasion, in or
6 about October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by
7 Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in
8 Florida.
9 Four, on multiple occasions between in or about 2001
10 and in or about 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or one of Epstein's
11 other employees called Carolyn to schedule an appointment for
12 Carolyn to massage Epstein. For example, in or about April of
13 2004 or May of 2004, another employee of Epstein's called
14 Carolyn to schedule such appointments.
15 In order for government to satisfy this element, it's
16 not necessary for the government to prove that Ms. Maxwell
17 committed the overt act. It is sufficient for the government
18 to show that any of the members of the conspiracy knowingly
19 committed some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
20 Further, the overt act need not be one that is alleged
21 in the indictment. Rather, it can be any overt act that is
22 substantially similar to those acts alleged in the indictment,
23 if you are convinced that the act occurred while the conspiracy
24 was still in existence and that it was done in furtherance of
25 the conspiracy as described in the indictment.
2 Three, between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004,
3 Epstein's employees sent Carolyn gifts, including lingerie from
4 an address in the Southern District of New York to Carolyn's
5 residence in Florida. For example, on one occasion, in or
6 about October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by
7 Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in
8 Florida.
9 Four, on multiple occasions between in or about 2001
10 and in or about 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or one of Epstein's
11 other employees called Carolyn to schedule an appointment for
12 Carolyn to massage Epstein. For example, in or about April of
13 2004 or May of 2004, another employee of Epstein's called
14 Carolyn to schedule such appointments.
15 In order for government to satisfy this element, it's
16 not necessary for the government to prove that Ms. Maxwell
17 committed the overt act. It is sufficient for the government
18 to show that any of the members of the conspiracy knowingly
19 committed some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
20 Further, the overt act need not be one that is alleged
21 in the indictment. Rather, it can be any overt act that is
22 substantially similar to those acts alleged in the indictment,
23 if you are convinced that the act occurred while the conspiracy
24 was still in existence and that it was done in furtherance of
25 the conspiracy as described in the indictment.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017245
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document