DOJ-OGR-00022064.jpg
594 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
594 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 35) in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It outlines the government's legal arguments against providing additional discovery materials to a defendant named Thomas. The arguments assert that the government has met its obligations, the requested materials are not relevant, and they are not required to collect materials from agencies outside the prosecution team.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas |
Mentioned as the subject of the legal argument, likely the defendant, in sections like "Thomas is Not Entitled to Add...
|
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned in the section heading "Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant’s Request for Additional Materials".
|
| Brady |
Referenced as a legal precedent in the section "Brady & Giglio" under "Applicable Law".
|
|
| Giglio |
Referenced as a legal precedent in the section "Brady & Giglio" under "Applicable Law".
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government | government agency |
Mentioned throughout the document as a party in the legal case, for example in "The Government’s Discovery Production...
|
| Prosecution Team | government agency |
Mentioned in the section heading "The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part...
|
| Inspector General | government agency |
Mentioned in the section heading "Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure".
|
Timeline (3 events)
The Indictment, as listed in the Statement of Facts.
Pretrial Discovery, including the Government's production and the Defense's requests for additional materials.
Relationships (1)
The document is a table of contents for a legal argument where 'The Government' is arguing against requests made by 'Thomas' (the defendant) in a criminal case.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,998 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................ 2
I. The Indictment ................................................................................................................. 2
II. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant’s Request for Additional Materials .................... 3
A. The Government’s Discovery Production ............................................................ 3
B. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials.......................................... 4
ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................................. 7
I. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................... 7
A. Brady & Giglio ...................................................................................................... 7
B. Rule 16.................................................................................................................. 8
II. Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials ............................................................ 8
A. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations .......... 8
B. The Requested Records Are Not “Material” to Preparing a Defense and Are
Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification .............................. 10
Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification .............................. 10
1. Applicable Law ............................................................................................ 10
2. Discussion .................................................................................................... 12
C. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who
Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team .............................................................. 15
Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team .............................................................. 15
1. Applicable Law ............................................................................................ 16
2. Discussion .................................................................................................... 19
D. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure...................... 21
E. Thomas Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in
Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim .......................................................... 24
Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim .......................................................... 24
1. Applicable Law ............................................................................................ 24
2. Discussion .................................................................................................... 26
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................ 29
DOJ-OGR-00022064
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document