DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg

484 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 484 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey before a judge. The discussion centers on whether a complaint's allegations are limited to a period ending in August 2003, which Mr. Pagliuca asserts is inconsistent with testimony. Ms. Comey counters that the complaint is consistent and suggests how to question the witness, Carolyn, on the matter.

People (4)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on objections ('Sustained') and asking clarifying questions.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, arguing that the allegations in a complaint do not extend beyond August 2003.
MS. COMEY Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court as 'Your Honor' and arguing that the complaint is consistent.
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ('Carolyn - cross').

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion during a court hearing regarding the end date of allegations in a complaint, specifically whether they extend past August 2003.
Courtroom in the Southern District

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'

Relationships (4)

MR. PAGLIUCA Professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney making arguments to the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
MS. COMEY Professional THE COURT
Ms. Comey is an attorney addressing the judge as 'Your Honor' in a formal court proceeding.
MR. PAGLIUCA Professional (Adversarial) MS. COMEY
They are presenting opposing arguments to the court regarding the interpretation of a complaint.
MR. PAGLIUCA Professional (Legal) Carolyn
The document header indicates that a cross-examination of 'Carolyn' is underway, a process conducted by an opposing attorney like Mr. Pagliuca.

Key Quotes (3)

"These are the end dates of the allegations, which brackets it before 2004, which is inconsistent with the testimony. And so these are the last two dates alleged in this complaint which does not go farther than August of 2003."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Arguing that the complaint limits the allegations to a period ending in August 2003.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I think the paragraphs themselves are still consistent. I think Mr. Pagliuca can make the point by asking the question of the witness about whether there were any allegations contained after August 2003 in the complaint."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Responding to Mr. Pagliuca's argument and suggesting a way to proceed with questioning the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #2
"Is there a line that says it's the final contact?"
Source
— THE COURT (Asking for clarification on whether the complaint explicitly states that the August 2003 incident was the last one.)
DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,154 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 213 of 264
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross 1654
1 THE COURT: Sustained.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: 177.
3 THE COURT: Sustained.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: 183.
5 THE COURT: Sustained.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: There's a slightly different argument
7 on 189.
8 THE COURT: Okay.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: And 195.
10 These are the end dates of the allegations, which
11 brackets it before 2004, which is inconsistent with the
12 testimony. And so these are the last two dates alleged in this
13 complaint which does not go farther than August of 2003.
14 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think the paragraphs
15 themselves are still consistent. I think Mr. Pagliuca can make
16 the point by asking the question of the witness about whether
17 there were any allegations contained after August 2003 in the
18 complaint.
19 THE COURT: Is there a line that says it's the final
20 contact?
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, it just says August 2003,
22 incident one and incident two.
23 THE COURT: Right.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: And there are no further allegations in
25 the complaint.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018811

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document