This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey before a judge. The discussion centers on whether a complaint's allegations are limited to a period ending in August 2003, which Mr. Pagliuca asserts is inconsistent with testimony. Ms. Comey counters that the complaint is consistent and suggests how to question the witness, Carolyn, on the matter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on objections ('Sustained') and asking clarifying questions.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing that the allegations in a complaint do not extend beyond August 2003.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court as 'Your Honor' and arguing that the complaint is consistent.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ('Carolyn - cross').
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"These are the end dates of the allegations, which brackets it before 2004, which is inconsistent with the testimony. And so these are the last two dates alleged in this complaint which does not go farther than August of 2003."Source
"Your Honor, I think the paragraphs themselves are still consistent. I think Mr. Pagliuca can make the point by asking the question of the witness about whether there were any allegations contained after August 2003 in the complaint."Source
"Is there a line that says it's the final contact?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,154 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document