DOJ-OGR-00014604.jpg
617 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
617 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, is a page from jury instructions in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. It details the government's burden of proof for several counts, including proving that Ms. Maxwell knew an individual named Jane was under 17 and that a significant purpose of transporting her across state lines was for illegal sexual activity. The document clarifies that the intended illegal act did not need to be accomplished for the defendant to be found guilty, as long as the intent was present at the time of transportation.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Alleged victim |
Mentioned as the individual whose travel across state lines was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity and who wa...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant who the government must prove knew Jane was under 17 at the time of the acts alleged in Count Four.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Transportation of an individual (Jane) across state lines for the purpose of illegal sexual activity, as detailed in Counts Two and Four of an indictment.
across state lines
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of travel for the purpose of illegal sexual activity.
|
Relationships (1)
The document describes charges against Ms. Maxwell for transporting Jane, a minor, across state lines for illegal sexual activity.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,572 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 204 of 257
LCKVMAX8
Charge
3038
1 the person's actions.
2 The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt,
3 however, that a significant or motivating purpose of Jane's
4 travel across state lines was that she would engage in illegal
5 sexual activity; in other words, the illegal sexual activity
6 must not have been merely incidental to the trip.
7 Instruction No. 22. Count Four. Transportation of an
8 individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual
9 activity. Third element.
10 The third element of Count Four which the government
11 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew
12 that Jane was less than 17 years old at the time of the acts
13 alleged in Count Four of the indictment.
14 Instruction No. 23. Counts Two and Four. Failure to
15 accomplish intended activity is immaterial.
16 Now, with respect to Counts Two and Four, it is not a
17 defense that the sexual activity which may have been intended
18 by the defendant was not accomplished. In other words, it's
19 not necessary for the government to prove that anyone, in fact,
20 engaged in any sexual activity for which any person can be
21 charged with a criminal offense with the individual after she
22 was enticed for Count Two or transported for Count Four across
23 state lines. It is enough if the defendant has the requisite
24 intent at the time of the enticement or transportation.
25 Instruction No. 24. Count Six. Sex trafficking of an
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014604
LCKVMAX8
Charge
3038
1 the person's actions.
2 The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt,
3 however, that a significant or motivating purpose of Jane's
4 travel across state lines was that she would engage in illegal
5 sexual activity; in other words, the illegal sexual activity
6 must not have been merely incidental to the trip.
7 Instruction No. 22. Count Four. Transportation of an
8 individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual
9 activity. Third element.
10 The third element of Count Four which the government
11 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew
12 that Jane was less than 17 years old at the time of the acts
13 alleged in Count Four of the indictment.
14 Instruction No. 23. Counts Two and Four. Failure to
15 accomplish intended activity is immaterial.
16 Now, with respect to Counts Two and Four, it is not a
17 defense that the sexual activity which may have been intended
18 by the defendant was not accomplished. In other words, it's
19 not necessary for the government to prove that anyone, in fact,
20 engaged in any sexual activity for which any person can be
21 charged with a criminal offense with the individual after she
22 was enticed for Count Two or transported for Count Four across
23 state lines. It is enough if the defendant has the requisite
24 intent at the time of the enticement or transportation.
25 Instruction No. 24. Count Six. Sex trafficking of an
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014604
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document