DOJ-OGR-00016740.jpg
626 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
626 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument regarding the defense's request to introduce a new, 81-year-old witness. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, claims the witness is crucial for testifying about property records to challenge the timeline of events described by someone named Kate. The opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, objects, arguing that the late introduction constitutes a delayed disclosure and is prejudicial to her side.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for the inclusion of a new defense witness.
|
| Kate |
A person whose described events are being challenged by the proposed new witness.
|
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, objecting to the new witness due to delayed disclosure.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding judge in the case, addressed as 'Your Honor'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Identified as the court reporting agency at the bottom of the document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Attorneys for the defense and another party argue before the court about the introduction of a new witness after the defense had rested its case.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell argues in favor of calling a new witness, while Ms. Comey objects to it, indicating they are opposing counsel in a legal proceeding.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments for the Court's consideration.
Key Quotes (3)
"This is a witness that is extraordinarily relevant and sometimes things develop during trial and we need to get witnesses to address issues that come up at trial."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Justifying the need to introduce a new witness late in the proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00016740.jpg
Quote #1
"His testimony is relevant for a critical issue in this case, which is whether or not this -- the events that Kate described could have even taken place at the time they took place, which she alleges they took place in, and he should be heard."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining the specific purpose of the proposed witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00016740.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I just note this is the defense's third bite of this particular apple and it emphasizes the prejudice to us of delayed disclosure."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Objecting to the defense's request to call a new witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00016740.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,540 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 197 2552
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
defense case. We noted early last week that we were going to
rest. We rested on Friday. They then had five full days,
including three business days, to prepare. So we would object
to holding the case over to Monday for a new witness.
MR. EVERDELL: This is a witness that is
extraordinarily relevant and sometimes things develop during
trial and we need to get witnesses to address issues that come
up at trial. We were able to find this person and he's willing
to come, even those he's 81, because he wants to come and
provide this testimony if it's required.
This is extraordinarily relevant, especially with the
issue that came up with the property records and the issue
raised to the Court. He can directly speak to that issue. His
testimony is relevant for a critical issue in this case, which
is whether or not this -- the events that Kate described could
have even taken place at the time they took place, which she
alleges they took place in, and he should be heard.
MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I just note this is the
defense's third bite of this particular apple and it emphasizes
the prejudice to us of delayed disclosure. We will have no
opportunity to investigate further at this point.
THE COURT: I mean, what we talked about yesterday was
inclusion of documents that show ownership; right?
MR. EVERDELL: That's correct, your Honor.
THE COURT: And I think I said those could come in.
rest. We rested on Friday. They then had five full days,
including three business days, to prepare. So we would object
to holding the case over to Monday for a new witness.
MR. EVERDELL: This is a witness that is
extraordinarily relevant and sometimes things develop during
trial and we need to get witnesses to address issues that come
up at trial. We were able to find this person and he's willing
to come, even those he's 81, because he wants to come and
provide this testimony if it's required.
This is extraordinarily relevant, especially with the
issue that came up with the property records and the issue
raised to the Court. He can directly speak to that issue. His
testimony is relevant for a critical issue in this case, which
is whether or not this -- the events that Kate described could
have even taken place at the time they took place, which she
alleges they took place in, and he should be heard.
MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I just note this is the
defense's third bite of this particular apple and it emphasizes
the prejudice to us of delayed disclosure. We will have no
opportunity to investigate further at this point.
THE COURT: I mean, what we talked about yesterday was
inclusion of documents that show ownership; right?
MR. EVERDELL: That's correct, your Honor.
THE COURT: And I think I said those could come in.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016740
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document