DOJ-OGR-00013167.jpg
587 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
587 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a discussion about newly discovered text messages between a person named Jane and her brother. The government attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, requests a delay in calling a witness, Brian, to allow time to analyze the messages. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, agrees but expresses concern about the piecemeal disclosure of information and requests a formal, under-oath representation from the witness.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness (implied) |
Mentioned in the header in the context of a cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the session.
|
| Jane |
Mentioned as a party to communications with her brother.
|
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney (for the government) |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the government's position.
|
| Brian | Witness (potential) |
A person the government is considering calling to testify the next day.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (for the defense) |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the defense's position.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
An afternoon court session where the government disclosed the discovery of additional text messages and requested to delay calling a witness, Brian, until the next day to allow for analysis. The defense expressed concern about the piecemeal disclosure of information.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
The document refers to "the communication between the brother of Jane and Jane."
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, with Mr. Rohrbach representing the government and Ms. Menninger representing the defense.
Key Quotes (3)
"The government's view at this point is that it makes sense for us to fully run down and make sure we have identified the universe of text messages."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Explaining the government's rationale for wanting to delay calling the witness Brian.)
DOJ-OGR-00013167.jpg
Quote #1
"As long as the factual record is still undeveloped, I don't think it makes sense to start applying the law to those facts."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Responding to the government's proposal and stating the defense's position on applying the law prematurely.)
DOJ-OGR-00013167.jpg
Quote #2
"But I repeat my request that there be an actual under-oath representation by this witness about the communications rather than dribbling out information."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Expressing the defense's desire for a formal, sworn account of the communications instead of informal disclosures.)
DOJ-OGR-00013167.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,498 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 154 of 264
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
1 AFTERNOON SESSION
2 1:40 P.M.
3 THE COURT: All right. We'll take up the question of
4 the communication between the brother of Jane and Jane.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
6 During the break, the government did find some cases.
7 But we also learned toward the end of the break that there are
8 a small number of additional text messages.
9 The government's view at this point is that it makes
10 sense for us to fully run down and make sure we have identified
11 the universe of text messages. And we're willing to not call
12 Brian until tomorrow morning to give the parties an opportunity
13 to understand all the facts and provide an analysis of the law.
14 And so my understanding from talking to Ms. Menninger
15 is that the defense doesn't object to allowing us to brief this
16 issue tonight and call Brian and address it tomorrow morning.
17 THE COURT: Okay.
18 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. As long as the
19 factual record is still undeveloped, I don't think it makes
20 sense to start applying the law to those facts. But I repeat
21 my request that there be an actual under-oath representation by
22 this witness about the communications rather than dribbling out
23 information.
24 THE COURT: Well, I don't know if we'll need an under
25 oath prior to his testimony. Certainly it can be fully
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013167
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document