This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, the Court, and another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding the admission of evidence. The Court admits exhibit 2A unsealed and exhibits 2C through 2W under seal to protect the identities of witnesses and third parties, a measure to which Mr. Pagliuca has no objection.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for the admission and sealing of exhibits.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on the admission and sealing of exhibits.
|
| Alessi |
Mentioned in the header, likely the subject of the direct examination ("Alessi - Direct").
|
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, stating he has no objection to the sealing of exhibits.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"And I am overruling the objection as to 2C through 2W based on the testimony of the witness."Source
"And it's both to protect witnesses who you've authorized to testify under pseudonym, and to protect personal information of third parties who have names, phone numbers, and contact information in the other exhibits."Source
"No, the sealing I have no objection to,"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,274 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document