This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Ms. Comey, questions Alessi about whether his name, his wife's name, or Sarah Kellen's name appears in a specific book or binder. Another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning as leading, which the court sustains before permitting a rephrased version of the question.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alessi | Witness |
The person being questioned during a direct examination.
|
| Sarah Kellen |
The subject of questioning; the attorneys are trying to determine if her name is in a book/binder.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceeding, making rulings on objections.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness, Alessi.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
An attorney who objects to Ms. Comey's line of questioning.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
"Your Honor, I'm going to object to this process. He answered no, and this is essentially a leading question to change the answer."Source
"I'll sustain the leading objection. But otherwise, I'll allow it. Well, I'll permit the question that you asked. So I'll allow the question, which is, is Sarah Kellen's name in the book?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,300 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document