HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017337.jpg
1.02 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Manuscript draft / legal narrative / house oversight committee document
File Size:
1.02 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of similar House Oversight documents) discussing a legal anecdote. The text describes a situation where a young man falsely accused a fictional black man of rape to conceal a consensual gay encounter from his fiancé. The narrator uses this story to argue for the necessity of subjecting rape claims to the 'adversarial process' and probing.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Narrator ('I') | Author/Legal Professional |
Reflecting on a legal case involving a false rape accusation; likely Alan Dershowitz based on known document dumps.
|
| My colleague | Legal Professional |
Female colleague of the narrator who managed the young man's case and persuaded him to tell the truth.
|
| The young man | Client/Subject |
Falsely reported a rape to cover up a consensual gay encounter.
|
| Fiancé | Partner |
Engaged to the young man; was lied to initially.
|
| Man with whom he had consensual sex | Sexual Partner |
The actual person involved in the sexual encounter with the young man.
|
| Black man with the shark’s tooth | Fictional Suspect |
Description invented by the young man for the false police report.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Police |
Law enforcement agency that received the false report and later the confession.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unspecified
Filing of a false police report regarding a rape by a 'black man with a shark's tooth'.
Unspecified
Unspecified
Relationships (3)
Narrator
→
Professional
→
Colleague
referred to as 'my colleague', conferred together
referred to as 'his fiancé'
man with whom he had consensual sex
Key Quotes (3)
"My colleague insisted that the young man had a moral obligation to his fiancé and a legal obligation to the police to be truthful."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017337.jpg
Quote #1
"The young man didn’t want to get the man with whom he had consensual sex in trouble, so he invoked the stereotype of the “black man” rapist."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017337.jpg
Quote #2
"I do know that I learned a great deal from this experience about the complexities of sexual encounters and the need to subject claims of rape to the usual probing of the adversarial process."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017337.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,234 characters)
4.2.12
WC: 191694
WC: 191694
My colleague insisted that the young man had a moral obligation to his fiancé and a legal obligation to the police to be truthful.
At first, the young man refused, but my colleague, after conferring with me, told him he really had no choice, because she would be obligated to report his continuing crime of making a false report—a crime that endangered the life and liberty of anyone fitting the made-up description of the black man with the shark’s tooth. (The young man didn’t want to get the man with whom he had consensual sex in trouble, so he invoked the stereotype of the “black man” rapist.) My colleague told him that she would try to make a deal with the police under which he wouldn’t be charged with a crime in exchange for telling the truth.
The young man then told the police and his fiancé the truth. The police called off the all points bulletin, and my colleague persuaded the police not to press charges against the young man. I do not know how the engagement worked out, but I do know that I learned a great deal from this experience about the complexities of sexual encounters and the need to subject claims of rape to the usual probing of the adversarial process.
250
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017337
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document