DOJ-OGR-00011570.jpg
630 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
630 KB
Summary
This court transcript from July 22, 2022, details a discussion about victims in a conspiracy, establishing a recruitment chain where the defendant recruited Virginia, who recruited Carolyn, who then recruited Melissa. The court agrees with the government's position on this matter and overrules objections related to Carolyn's prior testimony about her age. The document also notes the defendant's objection to including a $10 million bequest from Epstein in her assets when determining her ability to pay fines.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Melissa | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim of a conspiracy, recruited by Carolyn, and a friend of Carolyn's.
|
| Virginia | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim of a conspiracy, recruited by the defendant, and who in turn recruited Carolyn. Her name appear...
|
| Carolyn | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim of a conspiracy, recruited by Virginia, and who in turn recruited Melissa. Her testimony regard...
|
| Mr. Everdell |
Addressed by the court regarding the defendant's objection to the inclusion of a bequest in her assets for the purpos...
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the source of a $10 million bequest to the defendant.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, agreeing with the government's objections and overruling others related to Carolyn's testi...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-07-22
A court proceeding where objections to the trial record and financial assessments were discussed.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (5)
The defendant had been involved with recruiting Virginia.
The defendant objects to the inclusion a $10 million bequest from Epstein being included in her assets.
Key Quotes (2)
"I agree with that, and for the reasons indicated, do -- I agree with the government's objection to the probation calculation for that reason."Source
— THE COURT
(The court agreeing with the government's position that Melissa and Virginia were victims of the conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00011570.jpg
Quote #1
"As I said, I credit Carolyn's testimony. The objections I would overrule because I think she accurately testified regarding her age both in 2004 and 2005, but it doesn't answer the question, as I see it, the legal question as to establishment of acts conspiratorial conduct in the relevant two-month period."Source
— THE COURT
(The court's ruling on objections pertaining to Carolyn's age and testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00011570.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,549 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 51 of 101
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
addressing the factual objections speak directly to this issue.
The record at trial amply established that Melissa and Virginia
were victims of this conspiracy, and that the defendant had
been involved with recruiting Virginia, who in turn recruited
Carolyn, who in turn recruited Melissa.
With respect to Melissa in particular, we would not
that, like Virginia, her name appears in the defendant's little
black book, noting that she's a friend of Carolyn's. For all
those reasons, and the reasons in our brief, we think the trial
record amply establishes that they were both victims of the
conspiracy.
THE COURT: I agree with that, and for the reasons
indicated, do -- I agree with the government's objection to the
probation calculation for that reason.
I think that means we don't need to resolve the
factual objections that pertain to Carolyn's age. As I said, I
credit Carolyn's testimony. The objections I would overrule
because I think she accurately testified regarding her age both
in 2004 and 2005, but it doesn't answer the question, as I see
it, the legal question as to establishment of acts
conspiratorial conduct in the relevant two-month period.
With respect to fines, Mr. Everdell, what is now
paragraph 172 of the revised report, the defendant objects to
the inclusion a $10 million bequest from Epstein being included
in her assets for purposes of determining her ability to pay a
The record at trial amply established that Melissa and Virginia
were victims of this conspiracy, and that the defendant had
been involved with recruiting Virginia, who in turn recruited
Carolyn, who in turn recruited Melissa.
With respect to Melissa in particular, we would not
that, like Virginia, her name appears in the defendant's little
black book, noting that she's a friend of Carolyn's. For all
those reasons, and the reasons in our brief, we think the trial
record amply establishes that they were both victims of the
conspiracy.
THE COURT: I agree with that, and for the reasons
indicated, do -- I agree with the government's objection to the
probation calculation for that reason.
I think that means we don't need to resolve the
factual objections that pertain to Carolyn's age. As I said, I
credit Carolyn's testimony. The objections I would overrule
because I think she accurately testified regarding her age both
in 2004 and 2005, but it doesn't answer the question, as I see
it, the legal question as to establishment of acts
conspiratorial conduct in the relevant two-month period.
With respect to fines, Mr. Everdell, what is now
paragraph 172 of the revised report, the defendant objects to
the inclusion a $10 million bequest from Epstein being included
in her assets for purposes of determining her ability to pay a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011570
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document