You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
506 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
506 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers. The questioning focuses on an unnamed assistant of Epstein, confirming she traveled frequently with him, shared a romantic relationship, and had the same first name as another individual known as 'Jane'. The witness clarifies that despite the shared name, the assistant and Jane are two different people.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
A witness, referred to as Mr. Rodgers, undergoing cross-examination.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to his assistant, with whom he traveled frequently and had a romantic relationship.
|
|
| Jane |
A person whose true first name is the same as Epstein's assistant. The witness confirms the assistant is not Jane.
|
|
| Epstein's assistant | Assistant |
An unnamed individual who is the subject of the questioning. She traveled with Epstein, had a romantic relationship w...
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Makes a statement during the proceedings: "You can put that way."
|
| Ms. Drescher |
A person asked to help with displaying a redacted exhibit (Government Exhibit 662R).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Government agency |
The judge addresses the jurors, telling them to put their folders away.
|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned in the context of "Government Exhibit 662R".
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding Epstein's assistant.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
The witness confirms they had a "romantic relationship" and that she was his "assistant" who "traveled frequently with Epstein on the planes".
The transcript confirms that Epstein's assistant has the "same first name as Jane's true first name" but that she "is not Jane".
Key Quotes (5)
"Without telling us the name, is that Epstein's assistant that had the same first name as Jane's true first name?"Source
— Questioner
(Establishing the identity of the person being discussed without naming her.)
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you know if they had a romantic relationship together?"Source
— Questioner
(Inquiring about the nature of the relationship between Epstein and his assistant.)
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes."Source
— Rodgers
(The witness's affirmative answer to whether Epstein and his assistant had a romantic relationship.)
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
Quote #3
"But she is not Jane; correct?"Source
— Questioner
(Clarifying that Epstein's assistant and the person named Jane are two different individuals.)
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
Quote #4
"No."Source
— Rodgers
(The witness's answer confirming that Epstein's assistant is not Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,234 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 207 of 262 1918
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Without telling us the name, is that Epstein's assistant
3 that had the same first name as Jane's true first name?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And that person you're looking at in the photographs who
6 had the same name, she traveled frequently with Epstein on the
7 planes; isn't that right?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Do you know if they had a romantic relationship together?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And she had a foreign accent, didn't she?
12 A. I'm not sure about that. Pretty good English.
13 Q. Her first name is actually spelled the same exact way as
14 Jane's first name; right?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. But she is not Jane; correct?
17 A. No.
18 MR. EVERDELL: You can put that way.
19 THE COURT: Jurors, you can put the folders away.
20 Q. I do want to look at some of those flights with Jane that
21 you looked at before. So if we could bring up Government
22 Exhibit 662R, which is redacted, and I'll ask Ms. Drescher to
23 help me, because I think she has the redacted copy. If we can
24 display page 44.
25 So do you see that in front of you, Mr. Rodgers?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013485
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document