A printed article from 'The Australian' dated October 22, 2011, featuring an interview with former Prime Minister Paul Keating by Paul Kelly. Keating discusses his post-office life, his philosophical approach to leadership, and critiques the contemporary Labor government (Rudd/Gillard) for failing to provide a compelling narrative for national reform. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (029665), indicating it was part of a document production, likely related to an investigation involving the files where this article was stored.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Keating | Former Australian Prime Minister / Interviewee |
Subject of the article, discussing his worldview, new book, and Australian politics.
|
| Paul Kelly | Editor-at-Large / Author |
Author of the article and interviewer.
|
| Bob Hawke | Former Australian Prime Minister |
Mentioned as a comparison to Keating's leadership style.
|
| John Howard | Former Australian Prime Minister |
Mentioned as a comparison to Keating's leadership style.
|
| The Queen | Monarch |
Mentioned in the context of Keating broaching the republic issue.
|
| Kevin Rudd | Former Australian Prime Minister |
Criticized by Keating for lacking an over-arching story.
|
| Julia Gillard | Australian Prime Minister (at time of article) |
Criticized by Keating for lacking an over-arching story.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Australian |
Source of the article.
|
|
| Labor Party |
Keating supports the party but critiques its current strategy.
|
"The great changes in civilisation and society have been wrought by deeply held beliefs and passion rather than by a process of rational deduction"Source
"The failure of the Rudd and Gillard administrations is the lack of an over-arching story, the lack of a compelling story"Source
"And governments, to succeed with change, must be in the business of educating the community."Source
"What is the framework? It is 'Australia in Transition' strategically and economically."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,652 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document