This court transcript from August 22, 2022, details a discussion about finalizing a judgment in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Court informs counsel of its decision to set the end date of the criminal conspiracy as July 2004, noting this differs from the government's previous position. The government's counsel, Ms. Moe, states she will review the exhibits and will only file a written objection if the date conflicts with the sentencing transcript.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel for the government |
Speaking on behalf of the government in a court proceeding, responding to the judge.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel |
Speaking in a court proceeding, stating she has no further matters or objections.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, making rulings, and addressing counsel. Referred to as 'your Honor'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
Represented by Ms. Moe; mentioned as having taken a different position on the conspiracy end date.
|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The judicial body conducting the proceeding and making decisions.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, indicating they are the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"the Court intends to indicate the end of the conspiracy date as the last date in the record, which I believe is in July of 2004, of acts in furtherance of the criminal conduct, and obviously the government took a different position with respect to that."Source
"We will review the exhibits. If that date is different from the sentencing transcript, we will submit a letter to the Court, but otherwise no objection, your Honor."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,408 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document