This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Espinosa | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination.
|
| Ghislaine |
Mentioned as the person who used to sit in a particular office.
|
|
| Sarah Kellen |
Identified by the witness as the person who was in the office where Ghislaine used to sit.
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness and addressing the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the proceeding, interacting with the attorneys.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
An attorney conferring with Mr. Everdell and addressing the court.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned in relation to "Government's Exhibit 327" and as a party to confer with.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location being discussed in the testimony.
|
"That would have been Sarah Kellen."Source
"I want to show you what's already in evidence as Government's Exhibit 327."Source
"It's a public document; correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,160 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document