DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg

490 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 490 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Espinosa Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination.
Ghislaine
Mentioned as the person who used to sit in a particular office.
Sarah Kellen
Identified by the witness as the person who was in the office where Ghislaine used to sit.
MR. EVERDELL Attorney
An attorney questioning the witness and addressing the court.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge in the proceeding, interacting with the attorneys.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
An attorney conferring with Mr. Everdell and addressing the court.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government Government agency
Mentioned in relation to "Government's Exhibit 327" and as a party to confer with.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination of witness Espinosa regarding the occupants of an office and the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327.
Courtroom (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location being discussed in the testimony.

Relationships (3)

Sarah Kellen Professional (implied) Ghislaine
Sarah Kellen was identified as being in the office that Ghislaine used to occupy, suggesting a connection through their work or place of work.
MR. EVERDELL Professional MS. POMERANTZ
They are both attorneys in the same legal proceeding and confer with each other regarding court procedure ("We'll just confer with the government.").
MR. EVERDELL Professional Espinosa
Mr. Everdell is conducting the direct examination of the witness, Espinosa.

Key Quotes (3)

"That would have been Sarah Kellen."
Source
— A (Witness Espinosa) (In response to a question about who was in the office where Ghislaine used to sit.)
DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg
Quote #1
"I want to show you what's already in evidence as Government's Exhibit 327."
Source
— Q (Questioner, likely Mr. Everdell) (Informing the witness about the evidence to be presented.)
DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg
Quote #2
"It's a public document; correct?"
Source
— THE COURT (Asking for clarification on the status of the exhibit before it is shown.)
DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,160 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 80 of 246 2375
LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct
1 Q. Okay. Was there anyone else who was in the office who, for
2 example, was sitting in the office where Ghislaine used to sit?
3 A. That would have been Sarah Kellen.
4 Q. Sarah who?
5 A. Kellen.
6 Q. Okay. I want to show you what's already in evidence as
7 Government's Exhibit 327.
8 MR. EVERDELL: If we can put that on the screen.
9 THE COURT: You may.
10 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.
11 For the Court, deputy, the witness, and the jurors,
12 with the Court's permission.
13 THE COURT: It's a public document; correct?
14 MR. EVERDELL: It's not under seal, your Honor, as far
15 as I know.
16 THE COURT: Correct?
17 MS. POMERANTZ: I believe that's correct, your Honor.
18 MR. EVERDELL: We'll just confer with the government.
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Just take a quick look, your Honor.
20 It's fine, your Honor. Thank you.
21 THE COURT: Okay. So you can publish.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.
23 So we'll also put it on the jurors' screens, if we
24 could.
25 BY MR. EVERDELL:
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013939

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document