EFTA00013998.pdf
23.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email
File Size:
23.5 KB
Summary
An email dated June 3, 2008, with subject 'Draft Indictment' sent between redacted parties. The sender attaches two WordPerfect files (.wpd) containing a revised indictment, one with a watermark and one without, in response to a request conveyed via a phone call from a redacted individual.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| [Redacted Sender] | Sender |
Sent the email containing draft indictments.
|
| [Redacted Recipient] | Recipient |
Recipient of the email.
|
| [Redacted Caller] | Caller |
Called the sender to request the documents.
|
| [Redacted Person] | Subject of Request |
The person who 'needed a copy of this'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2008-06-03
Relationships (1)
Caller contacted sender to request documents.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (584 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Bcc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Draft Indictment
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:43:19 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 080429_revised_indictment_without_Watermark.wpd;
080429_revised_indictment_with_Watermark.wpd
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Bcc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Draft Indictment
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:43:19 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 080429_revised_indictment_without_Watermark.wpd;
080429_revised_indictment_with_Watermark.wpd
Hi [REDACTED] called and said that [REDACTED] needed a copy of this. The first copy has a “draft” watermark on it, and the second is exactly the same except that the watermark is removed.
<<080429 revised indictment without Watermark.wpd>> Thanks!
<<080429 revised indictment with Watermark.wpd>>
[REDACTED BLOCK]
EFTA00013998
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document