DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
562 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
562 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government argues against the defendant's legal claims, stating a non-prosecution agreement is not applicable and that the case will proceed, and urges the court to order the defendant's detention. Following the government's statement, a lawyer named Mr. Weinberg begins to address the court.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the government representative and Mr. Weinberg as "your Honor".
|
| MR. WEINBERG | Counsel |
A speaker in the transcript who addresses the Court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-24
A legal proceeding where the government presented arguments against the defendant's legal claims regarding a non-prosecution agreement and argued for the defendant's detention.
A courtroom in an unspecified district.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of the applicability of a non-prosecution agreement.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Weinberg addresses the judge respectfully as "your Honor" and responds to the Court's direction.
government
→
adversarial
→
defendant
The government is arguing against the defendant's legal positions, asserting he will be convicted, and requesting his detention.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court should have no confidence whatsoever that the defendant would stick around to pursue long-shot, dubious legal arguments at some future time."Source
— Unnamed government representative
(Arguing for the defendant's detention by questioning his reliability.)
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
Quote #1
"This case will go forward."Source
— Unnamed government representative
(Asserting the government's intention to proceed with the prosecution despite the defense's arguments.)
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court should ensure he is here when that time comes by ordering his detention."Source
— Unnamed government representative
(Directly requesting the court to detain the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
Quote #3
"Thank you, your Honor."Source
— MR. WEINBERG
(Addressing the judge after being acknowledged by the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,356 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 21 of 74
government is not aware of any at this time, your Honor.
Now, turning just very briefly to some of the legal
arguments that defense counsel raised in their submission, the
defendant raised legal arguments that he says he intends to
argue later.
arguments that defense counsel raised in their submission, the
defendant raised legal arguments that he says he intends to
argue later.
The Court should have no confidence whatsoever that
the defendant would stick around to pursue long-shot, dubious
legal arguments at some future time. As set forth in the
government's submission, the non-prosecution agreement does not
preclude this prosecution.
the defendant would stick around to pursue long-shot, dubious
legal arguments at some future time. As set forth in the
government's submission, the non-prosecution agreement does not
preclude this prosecution.
And even if that agreement were applicable to this
district, which it is not, the defense itself acknowledges that
the indictment included evidence beyond the initial
investigation. That effectively moots this issue for the bail
argument. This case will go forward.
district, which it is not, the defense itself acknowledges that
the indictment included evidence beyond the initial
investigation. That effectively moots this issue for the bail
argument. This case will go forward.
The defendant will lose any argument about due
process. He will lose any argument about pre-indictment delay.
And if he choses to be tried before a jury of his peers, we are
confident he will be convicted.
process. He will lose any argument about pre-indictment delay.
And if he choses to be tried before a jury of his peers, we are
confident he will be convicted.
The Court should ensure he is here when that time
comes by ordering his detention.
comes by ordering his detention.
THE COURT: Counsel.
MR. WEINBERG: Thank you, your Honor.
If I can, your Honor, before responding to the Court's
questions, put this case in some context.
questions, put this case in some context.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000531
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document