DOJ-OGR-00009394.jpg

403 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 403 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of legal testimony from an individual named Edelstein, filed on February 24, 2020. Edelstein is questioned about receiving a memo from David Benhamou via email while in San Francisco, which detailed information on 'Juror No. 1', an 'Appellate Division order', and a 'Westlaw report'. The questioning also reveals that Edelstein's partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, referred to the information as a 'dossier' and that Edelstein reviewed a suspension report concerning a Catherine M. Conrad from Bronxville.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Deponent
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
Theresa Trzaskoma Partner
Mentioned as the witness's (Edelstein's) partner who characterized a report as a 'dossier'.
David Benhamou
Mentioned as the author of a memo received by Edelstein.
Juror No. 1 Juror
Mentioned as the subject of voir dire responses detailed in a memo by David Benhamou.
Catherine Conrad
Mentioned as being in a suspension report, with the middle initial 'M'.
Catherine M. Conrad
Mentioned as the person in the suspension report who had a Bronxville address.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Westlaw Company
Mentioned as the source of a report linked in a memo.
Appellate Division Government Agency
An order from this entity was mentioned in a memo.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (1 events)

Edelstein received a memo written by David Benhamou via an email link/attachment.
San Francisco

Locations (2)

Location Context
The location where Edelstein received the information (memo/file).
Mentioned as the location of Catherine M. Conrad's address in a suspension report.

Relationships (2)

Edelstein Professional Theresa Trzaskoma
The document states Theresa Trzaskoma is Edelstein's 'own partner'.
Edelstein Professional David Benhamou
David Benhamou wrote a memo that was sent to Edelstein for his review.

Key Quotes (3)

"I was in San Francisco."
Source
— Edelstein (Answering a question about where he was when he received the information.)
DOJ-OGR-00009394.jpg
Quote #1
"I was given a link to it, attachment in the e-mail."
Source
— Edelstein (Explaining how he received the memo.)
DOJ-OGR-00009394.jpg
Quote #2
"It just laid out I think Juror No. 1's voir dire responses, it I think mentioned that there was the Appellate Division order and that there was a link to the Westlaw report."
Source
— Edelstein (Describing the contents of the memo written by David Benhamou.)
DOJ-OGR-00009394.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,334 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE-curDocument 616-2/20 Filed 02/24/20 Page 105 of 130
A-5790
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
333
1 put together and the Westlaw report.
2 Q. At what point did you become familiar with the fact that
3 your own partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, characterized it as a
4 dossier?
5 A. Several weeks later.
6 Q. So you received this information in the form of the file or
7 the memo to file by David Benhamou, is that correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. You were where when you received it? San Francisco?
10 A. I was in San Francisco.
11 Q. Who sent it to you?
12 A. I was given a link to it, attachment in the e-mail.
13 Q. And the link was to what?
14 A. Was to the memo that David Benhamou had written.
15 Q. And the memo said what?
16 A. It just laid out I think Juror No. 1's voir dire responses,
17 it I think mentioned that there was the Appellate Division
18 order and that there was a link to the Westlaw report.
19 Q. Did you look at the Appellate Division order?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. And did you notice that the Catherine Conrad in the
22 suspension report had a middle initial of M.?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Did you notice also that the Catherine M. Conrad in the
25 suspension report had a Bronxville address?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009394

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document