DOJ-OGR-00011529.jpg
609 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
609 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. In it, the judge makes findings of fact, stating it is probable the defendant paid Carolyn and Virginia for bringing and recruiting other girls. The judge then overrules two objections: one regarding the inclusion of a person named Kate, and another concerning the characterization of the defendant having groomed a person named Jane.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Testified that she was paid twice as much by the defendant when she brought friends to massages.
|
| Virginia | Witness/Recruiter |
Mentioned as also being paid more as encouragement to recruit additional girls.
|
| Kate | Victim |
Subject of an objection regarding her inclusion in a paragraph; the court notes she is not a victim of the crimes cha...
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
An attorney who interrupts the court for a clarification on a paragraph number.
|
| Jane | Victim |
Mentioned in relation to objections about the characterization of the defendant having groomed her.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned as having control of the household, paying Carolyn and Virginia, and being characterized as having groomed ...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Title used by Mr. Everdell to address the court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as not contending that Kate was a victim of the charged crimes, and being correct in its view on an objection.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
A judge makes findings of fact based on testimony and rules on several objections related to the inclusion of certain individuals' names and characterizations of the defendant's actions.
Court
THE COURT
Mr. Everdell
Relationships (4)
The defendant paid Carolyn directly, and paid her more when she brought friends to massages.
The defendant paid Virginia more as encouragement to recruit additional girls.
The document refers to objections about 'the characterization of the defendant having groomed Jane'.
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, addresses the judge ('Your Honor') during a court proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"Carolyn credibly testified that she was paid twice as much when she brought friends to the massages."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge making a finding of fact based on testimony presented at trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00011529.jpg
Quote #1
"I overrule this objection because the paragraph doesn't assert that Kate was a statutory victim as we've discussed throughout trial and the government didn't contend that Kate was a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment, and that paragraph doesn't assert that she was."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling and reasoning for denying an objection to the inclusion of Kate's name in a paragraph.)
DOJ-OGR-00011529.jpg
Quote #2
"I think the government is right here that the objection is conflating grooming with enticement to travel for purposes of sexual contact."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's reasoning for overruling objections to the characterization of the defendant having groomed Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00011529.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,627 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 10 of 101
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 Carolyn credibly testified that she was paid twice as
2 much when she brought friends to the massages. Based on the
3 defendant's control of household and Carolyn's testimony that
4 the defendant on occasion paid her directly, I find it more
5 probable than not by a preponderance of the evidence that
6 Virginia was also paid more as encouragement to recruit
7 additional girls.
8 Paragraph 9, there's an objection to the inclusion of
9 Kate in this paragraph. It argues that her name should be
10 deleted because Kate is not a victim of the crimes charged in
11 the indictment.
12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'm sorry to interrupt. I
13 think you said paragraph 9.
14 THE COURT: I did. I'm sorry. I'm skipping the first
15 number for some reason. 29. Thank you, Mr. Everdell.
16 I overrule this objection because the paragraph
17 doesn't assert that Kate was a statutory victim as we've
18 discussed throughout trial and the government didn't contend
19 that Kate was a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment,
20 and that paragraph doesn't assert that she was.
21 Paragraphs 30 to 38, there's objection throughout
22 these to the characterization of the defendant having groomed
23 Jane. I overrule these objections. I think the government is
24 right here that the objection is conflating grooming with
25 enticement to travel for purposes of sexual contact. Jane's
2 much when she brought friends to the massages. Based on the
3 defendant's control of household and Carolyn's testimony that
4 the defendant on occasion paid her directly, I find it more
5 probable than not by a preponderance of the evidence that
6 Virginia was also paid more as encouragement to recruit
7 additional girls.
8 Paragraph 9, there's an objection to the inclusion of
9 Kate in this paragraph. It argues that her name should be
10 deleted because Kate is not a victim of the crimes charged in
11 the indictment.
12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'm sorry to interrupt. I
13 think you said paragraph 9.
14 THE COURT: I did. I'm sorry. I'm skipping the first
15 number for some reason. 29. Thank you, Mr. Everdell.
16 I overrule this objection because the paragraph
17 doesn't assert that Kate was a statutory victim as we've
18 discussed throughout trial and the government didn't contend
19 that Kate was a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment,
20 and that paragraph doesn't assert that she was.
21 Paragraphs 30 to 38, there's objection throughout
22 these to the characterization of the defendant having groomed
23 Jane. I overrule these objections. I think the government is
24 right here that the objection is conflating grooming with
25 enticement to travel for purposes of sexual contact. Jane's
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011529
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011529
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document