DOJ-OGR-00021583.jpg
586 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
586 KB
Summary
This legal document analyzes the testimony of a woman named Carolyn to determine if a sex trafficking conspiracy involving her continued into November or December 2004. It discusses her testimony about visiting Epstein's house multiple times in 2004 after giving birth, and again in 2005 after turning 18, at which point Epstein allegedly asked for younger friends because she was 'too old for him'. The document notes that while there is evidence of contact, there is no specific evidence of conspiratorial conduct in the last two months of 2004.
People (2)
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (5 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location Carolyn stated she visited multiple times, including the last time when she was 18 years old.
|
Key Quotes (1)
"at 18 years old, she was too old for him"Source
— Carolyn
(Carolyn's explanation during her testimony for why Epstein asked if she had younger friends.)
DOJ-OGR-00021583.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,656 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page153 of 217
SA-407
38
M6SQmax1
me is specific and highly technical. Does the preponderance of
the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic
Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18
in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the
evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or
December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact
earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no
evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary
evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a
preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during
those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.
In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the
government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last
time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in
2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than
four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son
in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message
pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several
times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May
again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to
Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger
friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18
years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and
her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to
SA-407
38
M6SQmax1
me is specific and highly technical. Does the preponderance of
the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic
Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18
in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the
evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or
December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact
earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no
evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary
evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a
preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during
those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.
In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the
government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last
time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in
2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than
four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son
in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message
pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several
times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May
again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to
Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger
friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18
years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and
her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021583
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document