DOJ-OGR-00008660.jpg
280 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (jury instructions)
File Size:
280 KB
Summary
This document is page 122 (internal page 39) of a court filing dated December 18, 2021, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains specific jury instructions defining the conditions under which the jury must find Maxwell guilty or not guilty of being an 'aider and abettor' to a criminal venture.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell' and 'the Defendant'; subject of jury instructions regarding aiding and abetting charges.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'
|
|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case citation 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE'
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-18
Relationships (1)
Jury instructions questioning if she 'knowingly and willfully associate[d] herself' with the venture.
Key Quotes (4)
"Did the Defendant knowingly and willfully associate herself with the criminal venture?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008660.jpg
Quote #1
"Did the Defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008660.jpg
Quote #2
"If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor, and therefore guilty of the offense."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008660.jpg
Quote #3
"If, on the other hand, your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then Ms. Maxwell is not an aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty under that theory."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008660.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (589 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 122 of 167
1 2. Did the Defendant knowingly and willfully associate herself with the criminal
2 venture?
3 3. Did the Defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?
4 If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor, and therefore guilty of the offense.
5 If, on the other hand, your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then Ms. Maxwell is not an
6 aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty under that theory.
2 venture?
3 3. Did the Defendant seek by her actions to make the criminal venture succeed?
4 If she did, then Ms. Maxwell is an aider and abettor, and therefore guilty of the offense.
5 If, on the other hand, your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then Ms. Maxwell is not an
6 aider and abettor, and you must find her not guilty under that theory.
39
DOJ-OGR-00008660
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document