DOJ-OGR-00013288.jpg
623 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
623 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues for the relevance of documents, such as a birth certificate, to connect a Virginia Roberts (daughter of Sky Roberts) to the individual who was allegedly present at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and who was the subject of testimony by Juan Alessi and Carolyn. Opposing counsel, Ms. Sternheim, objects on the grounds of relevance and foundation.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Trump |
Mentioned in the context of the 'Trump company'.
|
|
| Virginia Roberts |
Central figure of the discussion, whose presence at Mar-a-Lago and connection to a birth certificate is being debated.
|
|
| Juan Alessi |
Mentioned as someone who claims to have seen Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and whose testimony is being discussed.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the legal proceedings.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, making a relevance objection.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing for the relevance of certain documents.
|
| Sky Roberts |
Mentioned as the father of Virginia Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate.
|
|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned as someone who provided testimony regarding Virginia Roberts.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Trump company | company |
Mentioned in the first line regarding the operation of the company.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2000
A Virginia Roberts was allegedly present in the area of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000.
Mar-a-Lago
2022-08-10
A court hearing where attorneys argue the relevance of evidence. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A location where Virginia Roberts was allegedly present in the year 2000.
|
Relationships (4)
The document states that evidence shows Virginia Roberts has a father named Sky Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate.
The document states that Juan Alessi claims to have seen Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and has provided testimony about her.
The document states that Carolyn provided testimony about Virginia Roberts.
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, with Ms. Sternheim making an objection and Mr. Rohrbach arguing against it.
Key Quotes (3)
"So is it a relevance objection?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking for clarification on the nature of the objection being made.)
DOJ-OGR-00013288.jpg
Quote #1
"It's relevance as well as foundation as a business record."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Stating the grounds for her objection to the evidence being presented.)
DOJ-OGR-00013288.jpg
Quote #2
"So these documents are relevant to connect the Virginia Roberts in the birth certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in the area of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000 which allows the jury to draw the inference that that is the Virginia Roberts who has been the subject of testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi and others."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Arguing for the relevance of documents by explaining how they link an individual on a birth certificate to a person who was at a specific location and the subject of testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013288.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,576 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 262 1715
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 to do with the operation of the Trump company or Mar-a-Lago.
2 The relevance is extraordinarily remote as there is nothing to
3 tie in the relationship or to suggest that Virginia Roberts was
4 at Mar-a-Lago during the period of time that Juan Alessi claims
5 to have seen her. There are no employment records for her and
6 there is nothing in the record to suggest anything concerning
7 her father.
8 THE COURT: So is it a relevance objection?
9 MS. STERNHEIM: It's relevance as well as foundation
10 as a business record.
11 THE COURT: Okay.
12 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose beginning with the relevance
13 objection, your Honor. The relevance for these documents
14 arises in three respects. First of all — and this is an
15 initial matter — Sky Roberts, the evidence already in the case
16 shows that there is a Virginia Roberts with a father named Sky
17 Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate. So these documents
18 are relevant to connect the Virginia Roberts in the birth
19 certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in the area
20 of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000 which allows the jury to draw
21 the inference that that is the Virginia Roberts who has been
22 the subject of testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi and others.
23 So these records both corroborate the fact that there
24 was a Virginia Roberts with an association of Mar-a-Lago at the
25 relevant time and corroborate and provide corroboration that
2 The relevance is extraordinarily remote as there is nothing to
3 tie in the relationship or to suggest that Virginia Roberts was
4 at Mar-a-Lago during the period of time that Juan Alessi claims
5 to have seen her. There are no employment records for her and
6 there is nothing in the record to suggest anything concerning
7 her father.
8 THE COURT: So is it a relevance objection?
9 MS. STERNHEIM: It's relevance as well as foundation
10 as a business record.
11 THE COURT: Okay.
12 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose beginning with the relevance
13 objection, your Honor. The relevance for these documents
14 arises in three respects. First of all — and this is an
15 initial matter — Sky Roberts, the evidence already in the case
16 shows that there is a Virginia Roberts with a father named Sky
17 Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate. So these documents
18 are relevant to connect the Virginia Roberts in the birth
19 certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in the area
20 of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000 which allows the jury to draw
21 the inference that that is the Virginia Roberts who has been
22 the subject of testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi and others.
23 So these records both corroborate the fact that there
24 was a Virginia Roberts with an association of Mar-a-Lago at the
25 relevant time and corroborate and provide corroboration that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013288
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document