DOJ-OGR-00017368.jpg
618 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
618 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding a juror's scheduling conflict around the Christmas holiday. Mr. Pagliuca argues that his decision on how to proceed depends on whether the juror is from the main or alternate pool, as this information would have affected their initial jury selection strategy.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the court proceeding, addressing the judge ('your Honor') about a juror issue.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the court proceeding, addressed as 'your Honor', discussing trial scheduling and juror information with ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
A discussion took place between Mr. Pagliuca and the Court regarding a juror's scheduling conflict around the Christmas holiday (24th-28th) and the implications for the trial schedule and jury composition.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
The dialogue is a formal exchange in a legal setting where Mr. Pagliuca addresses the court as 'your Honor' and discusses matters of trial procedure.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think under the veil of ignorance is a better place for everybody to be."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's reason for not telling either side which juror has a scheduling conflict.)
DOJ-OGR-00017368.jpg
Quote #1
"I would have less of a problem excusing the juror if the juror was in the alternate pool as opposed to the main pool."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Explaining why knowing the juror's pool (main or alternate) is critical to his analysis and decision-making regarding jury challenges.)
DOJ-OGR-00017368.jpg
Quote #2
"Had we understood that if this juror's plans couldn't be changed, we would have made a different choice while the entire venire"Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Justifying his need for more information by stating that this new scheduling issue would have altered their jury selection strategy.)
DOJ-OGR-00017368.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,616 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 247 131
LBUCmax1
LBUCmax1
1 or the 24th, and it's the weekend, Christmas weekend, 25th,
2 26th. The juror would be gone the 27th, 28th, would not make
3 sense to return for one day of that week. So, really, it would
4 be a 10-day break in the trial. I don't think that makes
5 sense, Mr. Pagliuca. I know I mentioned that, but I'm not sure
6 I had that fully in mind at the time, and that's practically
7 what we would be talking about.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate that, your Honor. Again,
9 I frankly don't want to delay this trial. The intention here
10 is, first, I don't know which juror this is, and that would
11 make a difference in my analysis here, frankly.
12 THE COURT: I mean, to be candid, that's why I'm not
13 telling you, because -- I'm not telling either side because I
14 think under the veil of ignorance is a better place for
15 everybody to be.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Let me be more specific, your Honor.
17 I'm not asking to know the specific juror, but what would make
18 a large difference to me is whether this person is in the
19 alternate pool versus the main pool of jurors. I would have
20 less of a problem excusing the juror if the juror was in the
21 alternate pool as opposed to the main pool. And the reason I
22 say that is we carefully exercised peremptory challenges in
23 this case, both to the main pool and the alternate pool. Had
24 we understood that if this juror's plans couldn't be changed,
25 we would have made a different choice while the entire venire
2 26th. The juror would be gone the 27th, 28th, would not make
3 sense to return for one day of that week. So, really, it would
4 be a 10-day break in the trial. I don't think that makes
5 sense, Mr. Pagliuca. I know I mentioned that, but I'm not sure
6 I had that fully in mind at the time, and that's practically
7 what we would be talking about.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate that, your Honor. Again,
9 I frankly don't want to delay this trial. The intention here
10 is, first, I don't know which juror this is, and that would
11 make a difference in my analysis here, frankly.
12 THE COURT: I mean, to be candid, that's why I'm not
13 telling you, because -- I'm not telling either side because I
14 think under the veil of ignorance is a better place for
15 everybody to be.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Let me be more specific, your Honor.
17 I'm not asking to know the specific juror, but what would make
18 a large difference to me is whether this person is in the
19 alternate pool versus the main pool of jurors. I would have
20 less of a problem excusing the juror if the juror was in the
21 alternate pool as opposed to the main pool. And the reason I
22 say that is we carefully exercised peremptory challenges in
23 this case, both to the main pool and the alternate pool. Had
24 we understood that if this juror's plans couldn't be changed,
25 we would have made a different choice while the entire venire
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017368
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document