DOJ-OGR-00019854.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's claim that she is a flight risk. The defense asserts that she chose to remain in the United States to fight the charges and has offered to renounce her British and French citizenships and place her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account to secure bond.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The central subject of the document, arguing she is not a flight risk and is willing to take steps to secure bond.
|
| Ms. Maxwell's spouse | Spouse |
Mentioned in the context of joint assets that would be placed in a monitored account.
|
| retired federal district judge | Monitor |
Proposed to monitor a new account containing Ms. Maxwell's and her spouse's assets.
|
| former U.S. Attorney | Monitor |
Proposed to monitor a new account containing Ms. Maxwell's and her spouse's assets.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government | government agency |
The opposing party in the legal case, arguing that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk due to foreign ties and assets.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Argument being made in favor of granting bond to Ms. Maxwell.
United States
Ms. Maxwell proposed to renounce her British and French citizenship.
Ms. Maxwell proposed to place her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The country Ms. Maxwell could have left but chose to stay in to fight charges.
|
|
|
Implied by the mention of renouncing her British citizenship.
|
|
|
Implied by the mention of renouncing her French citizenship.
|
Relationships (1)
The document mentions 'her and her spouse’s assets', indicating a spousal relationship with shared finances.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,316 characters)
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page26 of 31
profile is not flight. Ms. Maxwell could have left the United States had she wanted to flee. She did not want to do that and she did not do that. Instead, she chose to stay here and fight the bogus charges against her. This factor weighs heavily in favor of bond.
The government’s next argument is that she has foreign ties and significant assets. But Ms. Maxwell addressed those concerns by renouncing her British and French citizenship and by agreeing to have her and her spouse’s assets (other than basic living expenses and legal fees) placed in a new account that will be monitored by a retired federal district judge and former U.S. Attorney who will have authority over them. Ex.I.
Even someone with the government’s imagination can’t conjure up anything else Ms. Maxwell could do to show that she is serious about staying here to fight the allegations against her. She will agree to whatever condition the court orders and she will take the extraordinary step of renouncing her foreign citizenship. The government cannot explain how Ms. Maxwell could flee. She will have no assets (other than living expenses). She will have no country that will protect her. Her family and friends will be at risk. She will be heavily and
24
DOJ-OGR-00019854
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document