HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386.jpg
1.61 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal complaint
File Size:
1.61 MB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a legal complaint filed on June 20, 2016, where plaintiff "Jane Doe" alleges she was victimized after being enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties with other minors at a New York City residence used by defendant Jeffrey Epstein around 1994. The filing claims that defendant Trump attended at least four of these parties and identifies "Tiffany Doe," a former employee of Epstein, as a witness.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
A pseudonym for the plaintiff who alleges she was enticed to attend parties and was a victim of sexual assault. Descr...
|
| Tiffany Doe | Witness |
A pseudonym for a witness who was a former employee of Defendant Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Alleged to have used a New York City residence to hold parties with minor females.
|
| Defendant Trump | Defendant |
Alleged to have attended at least four of the parties hosted by Jeffrey Epstein.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
A U.S. Court of Appeals whose legal standards for proceeding anonymously are cited in the document.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears as a document identifier (Bates stamp), suggesting the document was part of a collection reviewed by a House ...
|
Timeline (1 events)
circa 1994
A series of parties with minor females held at a New York City residence used by Jeffrey Epstein. Plaintiff Jane Doe was allegedly enticed to attend.
A New York City residence
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The state under whose laws the alleged acts (predatory sexual assault, etc.) are claimed to be unlawful.
|
|
|
Location of a residence used by Jeffrey Epstein for a series of parties.
|
Relationships (4)
The document states, 'Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein.'
Plaintiff alleges she was enticed by Epstein to attend parties where sexual assault occurred.
Plaintiff alleges Defendant Trump attended at least four parties that she was also at.
The document identifies Jane Doe as the plaintiff and Tiffany Doe as a witness providing a declaration (Exhibit B) in the case.
Key Quotes (4)
"Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386.jpg
Quote #1
"Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386.jpg
Quote #2
"Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386.jpg
Quote #3
"At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,104 characters)
Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 3 of 9
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY
Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and
constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless
infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New
York law. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe,
Exhibit B hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes
anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for
privacy outweighs the public's interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the
defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This
litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of
Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the
ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity,
especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: "whether the litigation involves
matters that are 'highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,"' and "'whether identification poses
a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
even more critically, to innocent non-parties"'.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity.
Protecting Plaintiff's anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a
series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence
that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by
Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant
Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and
constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless
infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New
York law. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe,
Exhibit B hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes
anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for
privacy outweighs the public's interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the
defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This
litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of
Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the
ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity,
especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: "whether the litigation involves
matters that are 'highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,"' and "'whether identification poses
a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
even more critically, to innocent non-parties"'.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity.
Protecting Plaintiff's anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a
series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence
that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by
Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant
3
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026386
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document