DOJ-OGR-00008214.jpg

535 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 535 KB
Summary

This is a legal filing from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution is moving to admit photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence as evidence. The government argues that these photographs are relevant to the case because they serve to corroborate the testimony of a witness identified by the pseudonym 'Jane'.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge, United States District Court
Recipient of the letter, presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Named as the defendant in the case referenced in the 'Re:' line.
Jeffrey Epstein
Owner of the house in New York from which photographs are being submitted as evidence.
Jane Witness
A witness using a pseudonym whose testimony the photographs are intended to corroborate.
Silvio J. Mollo
The U.S. Attorney's office building is named after him.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice government agency
The entity submitting the letter, as indicated at the top of the document.
United States Attorney, Southern District of New York government agency
The specific office within the Department of Justice handling the prosecution.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York government agency
The court where the case is being heard and to which the letter is addressed.
The Government government agency
Used to refer to the prosecution (U.S. Department of Justice).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-12-04
The ongoing trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), where the government is moving to admit evidence.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
United States Ghislaine Maxwell

Locations (4)

Location Context
The jurisdiction of the United States Attorney and the District Court mentioned.
The address of the United States Attorney's office.
The address of the United States District Court where Judge Nathan presides.
Location of Jeffrey Epstein's house and the addresses of the court and U.S. Attorney's office.

Relationships (2)

United States legal adversary Ghislaine Maxwell
The document is a filing in the court case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'.
Jane unspecified Jeffrey Epstein
The testimony of the witness 'Jane' is being corroborated by photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's house, implying she has knowledge of the location.

Key Quotes (2)

"it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence,” and the fact “is of consequence in determining the action."
Source
— Fed. R. Evid. 401 (Quoted from the Federal Rules of Evidence to define what constitutes relevant evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00008214.jpg
Quote #1
"Relevant evidence is unless [another law] provides otherwise"
Source
— Fed. R. Evid. 402 (Quoted from the Federal Rules of Evidence regarding the admissibility of relevant evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00008214.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,388 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 523 Filed 12/04/21 Page 1 of 9
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
December 4, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter moving to admit photographs from the interior of Jeffrey Epstein’s house in New York. As explained below, particular images are corroborative of testimony by the witness using the pseudonym “Jane.” They are therefore relevant to the issues before the Court.¹
I. Applicable Law
Evidence is relevant if “it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence,” and the fact “is of consequence in determining the action.” Fed. R. Evid. 401; see Fed. R. Evid. 402 (“Relevant evidence is unless [another law] provides otherwise
¹ The Government has redacted the exhibits from this letter entirely to avoid publicizing photographs which may not be exhibits at trial. The Government is prepared to file publicly a version that contains redacted versions of the exhibits if the Court so orders.
1
DOJ-OGR-00008214

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document