This is a legal filing from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution is moving to admit photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence as evidence. The government argues that these photographs are relevant to the case because they serve to corroborate the testimony of a witness identified by the pseudonym 'Jane'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge, United States District Court |
Recipient of the letter, presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Named as the defendant in the case referenced in the 'Re:' line.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Owner of the house in New York from which photographs are being submitted as evidence.
|
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness using a pseudonym whose testimony the photographs are intended to corroborate.
|
| Silvio J. Mollo |
The U.S. Attorney's office building is named after him.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice | government agency |
The entity submitting the letter, as indicated at the top of the document.
|
| United States Attorney, Southern District of New York | government agency |
The specific office within the Department of Justice handling the prosecution.
|
| United States District Court, Southern District of New York | government agency |
The court where the case is being heard and to which the letter is addressed.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Used to refer to the prosecution (U.S. Department of Justice).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States Attorney and the District Court mentioned.
|
|
|
The address of the United States Attorney's office.
|
|
|
The address of the United States District Court where Judge Nathan presides.
|
|
|
Location of Jeffrey Epstein's house and the addresses of the court and U.S. Attorney's office.
|
"it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence,” and the fact “is of consequence in determining the action."Source
"Relevant evidence is unless [another law] provides otherwise"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,388 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document