This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically jury instructions from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The text guides the jury on how to assess the credibility of a witness who is a convicted felon, instructing them to use their own judgment, experience, and common sense to determine the weight of the testimony. It clarifies that a prior conviction is a factor to consider but does not automatically require them to disregard the testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the witness | witness |
An individual who provided testimony and is described as a convicted felon, whose credibility the jury must evaluate.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the venue where the jury evaluates testimony using their experience and common sense.
|
"You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness's credibility."Source
"You're not required to accept testimony even though the testimony is not contradicted and the witness's testimony is not challenged."Source
"You bring to this courtroom all your experience and common sense."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,682 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document