This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues for the exclusion of a portion of a video walk-through (Exhibit 296). The basis for the argument is that the video shows a photograph on a wall that the judge has already ruled inadmissible as a separate exhibit (Exhibit 288). The dialogue serves to clarify the distinction between multiple pieces of related evidence for the court record.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Parkinson |
Mentioned as someone who will describe a video walk-through along with agents.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, asking for clarification on exhibit numbers.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing for the exclusion of a portion of a video exhibit.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A location within a building shown in a video walk-through.
|
|
|
A location within a building shown in a video walk-through, leading to the master bedroom suite.
|
|
|
A location within a building shown in a video walk-through.
|
"Sorry. Which ones? 288?"Source
"So the photograph of that photograph. 288, you already excluded. That's a photo of that photo on the floor. 270 is the one we consent to, which is a photo of that photo still on the wall. And then 296 is the video walk-through where, when he does it, you will see the photo on the wall as the video goes through that hallway."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,590 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document