DOJ-OGR-00013973.jpg

611 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript from a legal case, specifically page 114 of 246. It involves questioning about language and memory, referencing a study published in 1978 and discussing how the wording of questions can affect witness recall of a simulated accident.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Loftus
Mentioned as the speaker during direct examination

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Court Reporting Agency
Company providing the transcript

Key Quotes (2)

"How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?"
Source
— Witnesses (Question asked to some witnesses)
DOJ-OGR-00013973.jpg
Quote #1
"How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?"
Source
— Others (Question asked to other witnesses)
DOJ-OGR-00013973.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,506 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 114 of 246 2409
LCGVMAX3
Loftus - direct
1 to them and adopted it as their own memory. And that study was
2 published in 1978.
3 Q. Have you conducted any studies that have to do with
4 language and how language might affect memory?
5 A. Yes. An example of that would be again, this is also a
6 fairly widely cited study.
7 We showed people a simulated accident. Afterwards, we
8 asked people about the speed of the vehicles involved in the
9 accident. But different witnesses are questioned in different
10 ways. So some witnesses are asked a question like, How fast
11 were the cars going when they smashed into each other? And
12 others are asked, How fast were the cars going when they hit
13 each other?
14 And we found that people estimated the speed as
15 greater if you used the word "smashed" than if you used the
16 word "hit." Also we had found that if we use the smash word,
17 this leading kind of biased word, it affected what other things
18 that people remembered. Our witnesses were more likely to
19 remember, for example, broken glass that didn't exist if we had
20 used that word smashed in questioning them.
21 So that's an example of what you're asking about, the
22 connection between language and memory.
23 Q. In the course of your research and experience, are you
24 aware of any experiments that have actually measured emotion
25 and its impact on memory?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013973

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document