DOJ-OGR-00002231(1).jpg
609 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
609 KB
Summary
This court order, dated December 28, 2020, and signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, denies the Defendant's application for release from custody. The Court reaffirms its initial decision, concluding that the Defendant is a flight risk and that pre-trial detention is warranted. The parties are ordered to submit a joint letter by December 30, 2020, regarding any proposed redactions.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | United States District Judge |
Signed the order denying the Defendant's application for release.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the court order, whose application for release was denied due to being considered a flight risk.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government agency |
The judicial body making the determination about the Defendant's detention.
|
| The Government | Government agency |
A party in the legal case against the Defendant, which the Court found met its burden of persuasion.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-12-28
The Court concluded that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pre-trial detention is warranted, denying the Defendant's application for release.
New York, New York
2020-12-30
The parties were ordered to submit a joint letter regarding any proposed redactions.
An initial bail hearing where the Court first determined that detention was warranted.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the order was dated and issued.
|
Relationships (2)
The Government and the Defendant are opposing parties in a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
Alison J. Nathan is the United States District Judge presiding over the Defendant's case and issued the order for her detention.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,638 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 104 Filed 12/28/20 Page 2 of 2
none of the new information that the Defendant presented in support of her application has a material bearing on the Court’s determination that she poses a flight risk.
Furthermore, for substantially the same reasons as the Court determined that detention was warranted in the initial bail hearing, the Court again concludes that no conditions of release can reasonably assure the Defendant’s appearance at future proceedings. In reaching that conclusion, the Court considers the nature and circumstances of the offenses charged, the weight of the evidence against the Defendant, the history and characteristics of the Defendant, and the nature and seriousness of the danger that the Defendant’s release would pose. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). The Government does not contend that the Defendant poses a danger to the community. Nonetheless the Court determines that the other three factors warrant detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). The Court also finds that the Defendant’s proposed bail conditions would not reasonably assure her appearance at future proceedings.
As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pre-trial detention continues to be warranted.
On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal.
This resolves Dkt No. 97.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 28, 2020
New York, New York
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00002231
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document