DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This court transcript, filed on August 10, 2022, captures a legal debate over the admissibility of a photograph. Defense counsel argues the photo is prejudicial, while Ms. Moe contends it is relevant; the judge ultimately overrules the objection. The discussion also references a witness named Kate, who testified earlier that day, and whose connection to the photograph is debated.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Argues for the relevance of an exhibit and defends herself against a suggestion of misrepresentation to the Court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, overrules an objection from the defense.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Argues against the introduction of a photograph, stating the subject of the photo did not testify about it.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned as the person who testified in the morning.
|
| Meder | Subject of testimony |
Mentioned in the header, indicating this portion of the transcript is from their direct examination.
|
| Unnamed defense counsel | Counsel |
The initial speaker (lines 1-6) who argues that a photograph is unduly prejudicial. Also referred to by Ms. Moe.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A legal argument took place regarding the admissibility of a photograph as evidence, during which an objection was overruled by the judge.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
They are opposing counsel in a legal proceeding, arguing opposite sides of an issue regarding the admissibility of evidence before a judge.
Ms. Moe is an attorney addressing the judge ('Your Honor') and making legal arguments in the courtroom.
Ms. Menninger is an attorney making legal arguments in the courtroom presided over by the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, defense counsel is grasping at straws here. This exhibit is plainly relevant."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing to the judge in favor of admitting an exhibit over the defense's objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg
Quote #1
"332, the objection is overruled."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling on the defense counsel's objection to the photograph.)
DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg
Quote #2
"And she didn't get on the stand and talk about photographs being taken of her. I mean, she didn't mention it. So now we're going to put in a photograph after she's left the stand."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Arguing against the introduction of a photograph because the witness it pertains to did not address it during her testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 261 1417
LC6Cmax7
Meder - direct
1 was above the age of maturity, which is not a crime, not
2 something my client is charged with, and is not a part of the
3 conspiracy in this case. And I think putting on a photograph
4 like that without any supporting testimony about when it was
5 taken, the circumstances under which it was taken is highly,
6 unduly prejudicial.
7 MS. MOE: Your Honor, defense counsel is grasping at
8 straws here. This exhibit is plainly relevant. It's
9 consistent with other trial exhibits and I do take issue with
10 the suggestion that I made any misrepresentation with the
11 Court. I certainly have not done that and would not do that,
12 your Honor.
13 THE COURT: 332, the objection is overruled.
14 309.
15 MS. MOE: Sorry. With respect to 309, that person is
16 the person who testified this morning as Kate. I unfortunately
17 haven't reviewed the final information recently, so I don't
18 want to make a representation to the Court and it becomes an
19 issue. We're happy to examine it and report to the Court this
20 evening. My memory is the file name for this is her first
21 name.
22 MS. MENNINGER: And the date was 2002 when she was 25.
23 And she didn't get on the stand and talk about photographs
24 being taken of her. I mean, she didn't mention it. So now
25 we're going to put in a photograph after she's left the stand.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018593
LC6Cmax7
Meder - direct
1 was above the age of maturity, which is not a crime, not
2 something my client is charged with, and is not a part of the
3 conspiracy in this case. And I think putting on a photograph
4 like that without any supporting testimony about when it was
5 taken, the circumstances under which it was taken is highly,
6 unduly prejudicial.
7 MS. MOE: Your Honor, defense counsel is grasping at
8 straws here. This exhibit is plainly relevant. It's
9 consistent with other trial exhibits and I do take issue with
10 the suggestion that I made any misrepresentation with the
11 Court. I certainly have not done that and would not do that,
12 your Honor.
13 THE COURT: 332, the objection is overruled.
14 309.
15 MS. MOE: Sorry. With respect to 309, that person is
16 the person who testified this morning as Kate. I unfortunately
17 haven't reviewed the final information recently, so I don't
18 want to make a representation to the Court and it becomes an
19 issue. We're happy to examine it and report to the Court this
20 evening. My memory is the file name for this is her first
21 name.
22 MS. MENNINGER: And the date was 2002 when she was 25.
23 And she didn't get on the stand and talk about photographs
24 being taken of her. I mean, she didn't mention it. So now
25 we're going to put in a photograph after she's left the stand.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018593
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document