DOJ-OGR-00008491.jpg
279 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
279 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on December 17, 2021, is a jury instruction (No. 27) from a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It pertains to Count Six, 'Sex Trafficking of a Minor,' and directs the jury on the second element the Government must prove: that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, knew that the victim, Carolyn, was under eighteen years of age.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the subject of a jury instruction regarding whether she knew a minor was under eighteen.
|
| Carolyn | Minor / Victim |
Identified as the minor in the charge of 'Sex Trafficking of a Minor', whose age is a key element of the case against...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the prosecuting party that must prove the elements of the charge against Ms. Maxwell.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-17
Filing of Document 562 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which contains jury instructions. Specifically, Instruction No. 27 details the second element of Count Six (Sex Trafficking of a Minor), focusing on the defendant's knowledge of the victim's age.
Relationships (2)
The document outlines a criminal charge (Sex Trafficking of a Minor) where Ms. Maxwell's knowledge of Carolyn's age is a central element to be proven by the Government.
The document states that the 'Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt' the charge against 'Ms. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (2)
"The second element of Count Six which the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew that Carolyn was under eighteen years of age."Source
— Court
(This is the core of Instruction No. 27, defining a key point for the jury to decide.)
DOJ-OGR-00008491.jpg
Quote #1
"In considering whether Ms. Maxwell knew that Carolyn had not attained the age of eighteen, please apply the definition of “knowingly” previously provided to you."Source
— Court
(This is a directive to the jury on how to legally interpret the term 'knew' in the context of the charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00008491.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,753 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 35 of 82
1 Instruction No. 27: Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor – Second Element
2 The second element of Count Six which the Government must prove beyond a reasonable
3 doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew that Carolyn was under eighteen years of age.
4 In considering whether Ms. Maxwell knew that Carolyn had not attained the age of
5 eighteen, please apply the definition of “knowingly” previously provided to you.
d-OGR-00008491
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document