DOJ-OGR-00009019.jpg
498 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
498 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, alleges juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had ever been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document sets up a section to discuss Juror No. 50's admissions of untruthfulness to the Court.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Alleged to have been untruthful on a jury questionnaire by denying he was a victim of a crime, sexual abuse, sexual a...
|
| A second deliberating juror | Juror |
Also alleged to have been untruthful on a jury questionnaire by denying they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual as...
|
| An original juror | Juror |
Mentioned in a footnote as having been excused due to a family commitment.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judicial body |
Administered the jury selection process, including questionnaires, and was allegedly misled by Juror No. 50.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Jurors completed questionnaires as part of the selection process. The document alleges that at least two jurors provided false information on these questionnaires.
An original juror was excused from service due to a family commitment, leading to an alternate juror becoming a deliberating juror.
Relationships (1)
The document alleges that Juror No. 50 was not truthful with the Court on his jury questionnaire.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,166 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 18 of 66
● Of the 5 jurors seated as alternates, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.⁴
● Of the 12 deliberating jurors, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
As we now know, however, Juror No. 50 was not telling the truth when he denied being a victim of a crime or being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment. And as explained below, it appears a second deliberating juror was also untruthful when they denied being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
II. Juror No. 50’s admissions that he wasn’t truthful with the Court
⁴ The court originally seated 6 alternates, but one alternate became a deliberating juror when an original juror was excused due to a family commitment. None of the 18 individuals selected for service as a deliberating or alternate juror answered “yes” when asked if they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
11
DOJ-OGR-00009019
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document