This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Counsel |
Speaking to the Court to clarify the preferred order for victim statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the case, responding to counsel's questions, and setting the order of proceedings.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Party in the case |
Mentioned by the Court as someone who will have an opportunity to make a statement after the government, victims, and...
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Counsel |
Addressed by the Court and confirms she has no objection to the proposed order of statements.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
"With respect to the sequence of events, just so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from victims before the Court hears from the parties or after?"Source
"I was anticipating government, victim statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes to make a statement."Source
"I'll see you at 1:00."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (985 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document