DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

444 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 444 KB
Summary

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Counsel
Speaking to the Court to clarify the preferred order for victim statements.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the case, responding to counsel's questions, and setting the order of proceedings.
Ms. Maxwell Party in the case
Mentioned by the Court as someone who will have an opportunity to make a statement after the government, victims, and...
Ms. Sternheim Counsel
Addressed by the Court and confirms she has no objection to the proposed order of statements.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-07-22
A procedural discussion during a court hearing regarding the sequence of statements to be made by victims, government, defense counsel, and parties.
Courtroom
2022-07-22
The Court announced a luncheon recess until 1:00.
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe Professional The Court
Ms. Moe, as counsel, formally addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and defers to the Court's preference on procedural matters.
Ms. Sternheim Professional The Court
The Court directly addresses Ms. Sternheim, who responds as counsel in the proceeding, indicating her agreement with the Court's proposed order.

Key Quotes (3)

"With respect to the sequence of events, just so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from victims before the Court hears from the parties or after?"
Source
— MS. MOE (Asking the judge for clarification on the order of proceedings for the benefit of the victims.)
DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg
Quote #1
"I was anticipating government, victim statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes to make a statement."
Source
— THE COURT (Responding to Ms. Moe's question by outlining the planned sequence for hearing statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg
Quote #2
"I'll see you at 1:00."
Source
— THE COURT (Announcing the time court will reconvene after a luncheon recess.)
DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (985 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 55 of 101 55
M6SQmaxl
1 break.
2 Ms. Moe
3 MS. MOE: With respect to the sequence of events, just
4 so victims are aware, would the Court prefer to hear from
5 victims before the Court hears from the parties or after? We
6 defer to the Court, but it would be helpful to know for the
7 victims.
8 THE COURT: I was anticipating government, victim
9 statements, defense counsel and then Ms. Maxwell if she wishes
10 to make a statement. My staff did provide counsel for the
11 victims making statements an order in which they're speaking.
12 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Any objection to that ordering, Ms. Moe?
14 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim?
16 MS. STERNHEIM: I'm on now. No. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: I'll see you at 1:00. Thank you.
18 (Luncheon recess taken)
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.



(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011574

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document