This document is a transcript of legal testimony where a witness, Edelstein, is questioned about a conversation with Theresa Trzaskoma and Susan Brune. Edelstein recounts that Trzaskoma, after receiving a note from Juror No. 1, recalled that there was a suspended New York lawyer with the same name as someone relevant to their case. The witness denies prior knowledge of this information from their firm and clarifies their understanding of the situation at the time.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness / Deponent |
The person answering questions (speaker 'A') in the transcript.
|
| Susan Brune |
Mentioned as walking with Edelstein and Theresa Trzaskoma across Centre Street.
|
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as walking with Edelstein and Susan Brune, and as the person who recalled information about a suspended law...
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The source of a note that 'raised certain legal concerns'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that created the transcript.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as part of the location where Edelstein, Susan Brune, and Theresa Trzaskoma were walking.
|
|
|
The street that Edelstein, Susan Brune, and Theresa Trzaskoma were walking across during their conversation.
|
|
|
Mentioned in reference to a 'suspended New York lawyer' and a 'suspended New York attorney'.
|
"Theresa said she just wanted to let us know that after receiving the note that we had received from Juror No. 1, which raised certain legal concerns, she had recalled that there was a suspended lawyer with the same name."Source
"As far as I recall, she had just mentioned that during voir dire she knew that there was a suspended lawyer with the same name."Source
"I didn't realize that there was a paper here that I should be asking about."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,343 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document