This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys and the judge regarding the admissibility of testimony about massages given by Jeffrey Epstein, with the judge ultimately sustaining an objection due to the timeframe. The transcript also details a logistical discussion about submitting a sensitive video under seal that contains images of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, asking questions about evidence and ruling on an objection.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking on behalf of a party in the trial, arguing for the relevance of evidence regarding massages and discussing a...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of massages he gave, which are being discussed as potentially sexual and probative evidence ...
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking in court, thanking the judge and mentioning a person or matter named Parkinson.
|
| Parkinson |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell, who states, "I think that's everything we have for Parkinson."
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
"The fact that Jeffrey Epstein's massages were sexual, even if it was just a year after the end of the conspiracy, is still probative of whether or not these massages were just massages, as I expect the defense will argue the defendant believed, or were, in fact, sexual."Source
"I would permit lab tests that indicated it was semen, but in light of the essentially lay description in combination with the timeframe issue, I'll sustain this objection."Source
"There was one logistical issue, which is we will be offering this video under seal because it contains images of witnesses who your Honor has permitted to testify under pseudonym and nude images of third parties."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,476 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document