This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. Brune, who appears to be associated with the defense counsel, is questioned about their understanding of the voir dire process, confirming that while the judge leads the questioning of potential jurors, the defense could propose questions and request inquiries into new areas, but the final decision to ask any question rested with the Court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The individual being questioned during a direct examination regarding the voir dire process.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who could be requested to make further inquiries during the voir dire process.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government agency |
Mentioned as having the authority to ask questions proposed by counsel and making the final decision on whether to as...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"I did, but I also understood that the Court would likely ask other questions if we proposed them."Source
"And it was the Court's decision, would you agree, whether or not to ask any particular question."Source
"It's not a decision that rests with you or the other defense counsel, correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,338 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document