DOJ-OGR-00011550.jpg
617 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
617 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing arguments in a criminal case. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, asserts that the defendant held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records showing they both traveled on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet during the same period. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, begins to challenge the prosecution's legal interpretation regarding the need to prove supervision of another criminal participant.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | conspirator |
Mentioned as one of two "knowing conspirators" along with Epstein.
|
| Epstein | conspirator |
Mentioned as one of two "knowing conspirators" along with Maxwell, and owner of a private jet.
|
| Sarah Kellen |
Described as a person who would report to the defendant and was traveling at the same time as the defendant on Epstei...
|
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the court proceeding, likely representing the prosecution, arguing the defendant's leadership role.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of people being his "close associates" while a scheme was ongoing. This is the same individu...
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
A speaker in the court proceeding, likely representing the defense, beginning to counter the government's argument.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-07-22
A court hearing where attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Everdell are presenting arguments to the Court regarding a defendant's role in a conspiracy.
Courtroom
The defendant and Sarah Kellen were flying on Epstein's private jet during an overlapping time period.
Epstein's private jet
Relationships (4)
The prosecution alleges the defendant had "leadership" over Sarah Kellen, to whom Kellen "would report".
The defendant flew on Epstein's private jet and is described as being a close associate during the time of the scheme.
Described as being a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein during the time of the scheme.
Key Quotes (2)
"the flight records reflect that the defendant continued flying on Epstein's private jet at the same time that Sarah Kellen was also traveling, and that there was an overlap in the years of the time period where they were all close associates of Jeffrey Epstein and the scheme was ongoing."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing to the court that there is evidence of an overlap in activities between the defendant and Sarah Kellen.)
DOJ-OGR-00011550.jpg
Quote #1
"the government seems to argue that there is some case law that is not clear that you don't have to necessarily show that they're supervising another criminal participant. That's just wrong."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Contesting the legal basis of the government's argument regarding the defendant's supervisory role.)
DOJ-OGR-00011550.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,781 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 31 of 101
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 very clear that when you have two knowing conspirators, Maxwell
2 and Epstein, and they bring in a much younger woman as an
3 assistant and have her take on some of those roles while the
4 defendant remains a lady of the house in the hierarchy of the
5 structure to whom a person like Sarah Kellen would report, that
6 she has leadership of that person; that she is directing that
7 person; that she has control. Even the simple task of
8 directing her to take on some of those responsibilities, which,
9 of course, to transition parts of that role she would have to
10 do would qualify for leadership.
11 THE COURT: And there's clear time overlap in the
12 role?
13 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As we noted in our brief,
14 the flight records reflect that the defendant continued flying
15 on Epstein's private jet at the same time that Sarah Kellen was
16 also traveling, and that there was an overlap in the years of
17 the time period where they were all close associates of Jeffrey
18 Epstein and the scheme was ongoing.
19 THE COURT: Go ahead.
20 MR. EVERDELL: Yes. Your Honor, before I address the
21 Sarah Kellen point, I would just make the point that the
22 government seems to argue that there is some case law that is
23 not clear that you don't have to necessarily show that they're
24 supervising another criminal participant. That's just wrong.
25 All those cases that the government cites, the issue has
2 and Epstein, and they bring in a much younger woman as an
3 assistant and have her take on some of those roles while the
4 defendant remains a lady of the house in the hierarchy of the
5 structure to whom a person like Sarah Kellen would report, that
6 she has leadership of that person; that she is directing that
7 person; that she has control. Even the simple task of
8 directing her to take on some of those responsibilities, which,
9 of course, to transition parts of that role she would have to
10 do would qualify for leadership.
11 THE COURT: And there's clear time overlap in the
12 role?
13 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As we noted in our brief,
14 the flight records reflect that the defendant continued flying
15 on Epstein's private jet at the same time that Sarah Kellen was
16 also traveling, and that there was an overlap in the years of
17 the time period where they were all close associates of Jeffrey
18 Epstein and the scheme was ongoing.
19 THE COURT: Go ahead.
20 MR. EVERDELL: Yes. Your Honor, before I address the
21 Sarah Kellen point, I would just make the point that the
22 government seems to argue that there is some case law that is
23 not clear that you don't have to necessarily show that they're
24 supervising another criminal participant. That's just wrong.
25 All those cases that the government cites, the issue has
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011550
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011550
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document