DOJ-OGR-00009486.jpg
466 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
466 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 24, 2022. It captures a conversation between the judge ('THE COURT') and a lawyer ('MR. SHECHTMAN') about the government's failure to disclose information in a timely manner and making misleading statements in a memorandum. Mr. Shechtman concedes the point and states his intention to submit the documents in question for the judge's private 'in camera' review, viewing it as an inevitable step to resolve the issue of privilege.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning a party's failure to disclose information.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Lawyer |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the Court's points about disclosure and privilege.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
A term used by Mr. Shechtman to refer to THE COURT.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | Judicial body |
The presiding judicial body in the case, mentioned throughout the transcript.
|
| the government | Government agency |
A party in the legal proceedings that allegedly failed to disclose information.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the conversation.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A conversation between THE COURT and MR. SHECHTMAN regarding disclosure of documents and misleading statements.
Courtroom
A motion was filed by a party (implied to be the government) a month and a half after a 'plaza conversation', at which time they failed to disclose key information.
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal courtroom exchange between a judge (THE COURT) and a lawyer (MR. SHECHTMAN) regarding legal matters in a case.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'm really thinking about beyond the plaza conversation, at the time a month and a half later when they filed their motion, they failed to disclose to the Court what they knew and when they knew it."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge expressing concern about the timing and lack of disclosure by a party in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00009486.jpg
Quote #1
"We are going to turn over those documents to the Court because worse come to worst, the Court is going to look at them in camera."Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(A lawyer explaining his legal strategy regarding privileged documents, acknowledging the court will likely review them privately.)
DOJ-OGR-00009486.jpg
Quote #2
"This is not a game."Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(Emphasizing the seriousness of the legal proceedings and the decision to turn over documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00009486.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,532 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-3 Filed 02/24/22 Page 67 of 117
A-5910
A-5910
8
CAC3PARC
conversation
conversation
THE COURT: I'm really thinking about beyond the plaza
conversation, at the time a month and a half later when they
filed their motion, they failed to disclose to the Court what
they knew and when they knew it. And a series of proceedings
then occur, essentially initiated by both the Court and the
government to find out what they knew and when they knew it.
And their statements in their memorandum to the Court on their
motion that they knew were wrong or misleading at the time that
they made them to me.
conversation, at the time a month and a half later when they
filed their motion, they failed to disclose to the Court what
they knew and when they knew it. And a series of proceedings
then occur, essentially initiated by both the Court and the
government to find out what they knew and when they knew it.
And their statements in their memorandum to the Court on their
motion that they knew were wrong or misleading at the time that
they made them to me.
MR. SHECHTMAN: You're not going to get much argument
from me on the point. The Court has a sort of lovely phrase in
the opinion about disclosure by iteration or something like
that. There is no doubt when you go from the telephone
conversation to the document itself, and then to and not
wanting further discovery, wanting your Honor to somehow
address a preliminary issue and issues of privilege. Your
Honor knows I act in this case late and the first thing I did
was to say, what are we kidding ourself? We are going to turn
over those documents to the Court because worse come to worst,
the Court is going to look at them in camera. And if it is
going to look at them in camera, it is going to look at them, I
don't know you can say out of camera, but it's going to look at
them. This is not a game.
from me on the point. The Court has a sort of lovely phrase in
the opinion about disclosure by iteration or something like
that. There is no doubt when you go from the telephone
conversation to the document itself, and then to and not
wanting further discovery, wanting your Honor to somehow
address a preliminary issue and issues of privilege. Your
Honor knows I act in this case late and the first thing I did
was to say, what are we kidding ourself? We are going to turn
over those documents to the Court because worse come to worst,
the Court is going to look at them in camera. And if it is
going to look at them in camera, it is going to look at them, I
don't know you can say out of camera, but it's going to look at
them. This is not a game.
I think what happened, though, is lawyers said to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009486
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document