This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between a judge and multiple counsel regarding a note from the jury. The jury, via Court Exhibit 9, asks if they can consider 'Annie's testimony' as evidence of conspiracy for two specific counts. The government's counsel, Ms. Comey, affirms this, while another counsel, Mr. Everdell, requests time to confer on the matter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding, discusses sending a PDF of notes with the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceeding, discusses jury dismissal, reads a note from the jury (Court Exhibit 9), and interacts ...
|
| Annie | Witness |
Her testimony is the subject of a note from the jury asking if it can be considered as conspiracy to commit a crime.
|
| MS. COMEY | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding, provides the government's affirmative response to the jury's question.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding, requests time to confer after hearing the jury's note and the government's response.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"Can we consider Annie's testimony as conspiracy to commit a crime in Counts One and Three?"Source
"The one-word answer would be correct here, your Honor, yes."Source
"Government's proposal is yes."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,203 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document