DOJ-OGR-00009384.jpg
395 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal transcript
File Size:
395 KB
Summary
This document is a legal transcript of testimony given by Ms. Edelstein. She is questioned about whether her partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, informed her on May 12 about potential misconduct by Juror No. 1. Ms. Edelstein denies being told that Trzaskoma believed the juror was a suspended New York attorney and claims she cannot recall the specifics of their conversation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript, referred to as Ms. Edelstein.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | Partner |
Described as Ms. Edelstein's partner, who allegedly came to her on May 12 to discuss juror misconduct.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of alleged misconduct, believed by Ms. Trzaskoma to be a suspended New York attorney.
|
| Susan Brune | Partner |
Described as Ms. Edelstein's partner, who gave testimony earlier that day describing Ms. Edelstein's character.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that produced the transcript.
|
Timeline (3 events)
May 12
A conversation between Theresa Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein after court regarding alleged juror misconduct.
May 12th
A court session took place on this day, after which Ms. Edelstein and Ms. Trzaskoma had a conversation.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the phrase 'suspended New York attorney'.
|
Relationships (2)
The document explicitly states that Theresa Trzaskoma is Ms. Edelstein's 'partner'.
The document explicitly states that Susan Brune is Ms. Edelstein's 'partner'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Is it not true, Ms. Edelstein, that on May 12, Theresa Trzaskoma, your partner, came to you and articulated to you her belief about possible juror misconduct by Juror No. 1? Yes or no?"Source
— Questioner
(A direct question to Ms. Edelstein about being informed of juror misconduct.)
DOJ-OGR-00009384.jpg
Quote #1
"No."Source
— Edelstein
(Ms. Edelstein's direct denial to the question about being informed of juror misconduct by Theresa Trzaskoma.)
DOJ-OGR-00009384.jpg
Quote #2
"So when Theresa Trzaskoma came to you, tell us your best recollection what she said to you?"Source
— Questioner
(A follow-up question asking for Ms. Edelstein's memory of her conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma.)
DOJ-OGR-00009384.jpg
Quote #3
"I can't recall exactly. It was after Court that day on May 12th. We were walking across --"Source
— Edelstein
(Ms. Edelstein's response, stating she cannot remember the specifics of the conversation.)
DOJ-OGR-00009384.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,522 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 95 of 130
A-5780
A-5780
323
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Is it not true, Ms. Edelstein, that on May 12, Theresa
3 Trzaskoma, your partner, came to you and articulated to you her
4 belief about possible juror misconduct by Juror No. 1? Yes or
5 no?
6 A. No.
7 Q. Did Ms. Trzaskoma tell you that she had sent an e-mail
8 earlier that day to the effect that Jesus, I think she's the
9 one, meaning that she thought Juror No. 1 was the suspended New
10 York attorney. Did she tell you that?
11 A. No.
12 Q. Did you learn that at any point during the conversation
13 with her?
14 A. No.
15 Q. Would you be surprised, Ms. Edelstein, if Susan Brune, your
16 partner, described you earlier in her testimony today as a
17 person who when confronted with an issue, you're someone who
18 demands the paper, wants to look at the underlying documents.
19 Is that fair?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So when Theresa Trzaskoma came to you, tell us your best
22 recollection what she said to you?
23 A. I can't recall exactly. It was after Court that day on
24 May 12th. We were walking across --
25 Q. We being?
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Is it not true, Ms. Edelstein, that on May 12, Theresa
3 Trzaskoma, your partner, came to you and articulated to you her
4 belief about possible juror misconduct by Juror No. 1? Yes or
5 no?
6 A. No.
7 Q. Did Ms. Trzaskoma tell you that she had sent an e-mail
8 earlier that day to the effect that Jesus, I think she's the
9 one, meaning that she thought Juror No. 1 was the suspended New
10 York attorney. Did she tell you that?
11 A. No.
12 Q. Did you learn that at any point during the conversation
13 with her?
14 A. No.
15 Q. Would you be surprised, Ms. Edelstein, if Susan Brune, your
16 partner, described you earlier in her testimony today as a
17 person who when confronted with an issue, you're someone who
18 demands the paper, wants to look at the underlying documents.
19 Is that fair?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So when Theresa Trzaskoma came to you, tell us your best
22 recollection what she said to you?
23 A. I can't recall exactly. It was after Court that day on
24 May 12th. We were walking across --
25 Q. We being?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009384
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document