You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00000914.jpg
591 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
591 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing for her innocence. It claims the government's evidence is weak and consists of old, untested hearsay, and that the prosecution is motivated by the 'Epstein Effect'—a need for a scapegoat following the public outrage over Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody. The filing asserts that this effect has biased prosecutors, the Bureau of Prisons, and the public against her.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal filing, who is being defended against charges. The document argues she is innocent and being...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
His death in government custody is cited as the cause of public outrage that led to the prosecution of Ms. Maxwell.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| district court | Government agency |
Mentioned for its 'exhortations regarding the strength of the evidence against Ms. Maxwell'.
|
| the government | Government agency |
The prosecuting entity whose evidence against Ms. Maxwell is described as 'palpably weak'.
|
| Bureau of Prisons | Government agency |
Mentioned for putting Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch, allegedly due to pressure after Epstein died on their watch.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The inexplicable death of Jeffrey Epstein while in government custody.
government custody
The charging of Ms. Maxwell by prosecutors.
prosecutors
Ms. Maxwell
The Bureau of Prisons placed Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch.
Relationships (2)
The document links the charges against Ms. Maxwell directly to the public outrage following the death of Jeffrey Epstein, implying their connection is central to the case.
The document describes an ongoing legal battle where the government is prosecuting Ms. Maxwell, and her defense is arguing the government's case is weak and improperly motivated.
Key Quotes (2)
"She is innocent unless and until she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt – an event which is highly unlikely given the lack of evidence against her."Source
— Author of the document (representing Ms. Maxwell)
(Asserting Ms. Maxwell's innocence and the weakness of the prosecution's case.)
DOJ-OGR-00000914.jpg
Quote #1
"The “Epstein Effect” clouded the judgment of the prosecutors into charging Ms. Maxwell because it needed a scapegoat..."Source
— Author of the document (representing Ms. Maxwell)
(Providing a reason for what is claimed to be a baseless prosecution, linking it to the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death.)
DOJ-OGR-00000914.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,198 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page4 of 31
These conditions would support a complaint for cruel and unusual punishment for a convicted felon. Ms. Maxwell is not one. She is innocent unless and until she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt – an event which is highly unlikely given the lack of evidence against her.
Despite the district court’s exhortations regarding the strength of the evidence against Ms. Maxwell, the truth is that the government’s so-called “evidence,” though voluminous, is palpably weak. It consists of anonymous, untested hearsay accusations about events that are alleged to have occurred decades ago, accusations which only surfaced when the government faced public outrage over the inexplicable death of Jeffrey Epstein, while in their custody.
The “Epstein Effect” clouded the judgment of the prosecutors into charging Ms. Maxwell because it needed a scapegoat, the Bureau of Prisons into putting Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch because Epstein died on their watch, the media into an absolute frenzy, and many other fair-minded people into viewing Ms. Maxwell as guilty even though no evidence has been presented against her.
2
DOJ-OGR-00000914
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document