This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is arguing against the credibility of a witness named Carolyn. Menninger asserts there is no physical evidence, such as phone or FedEx records, to support Carolyn's claim of being contacted by Ghislaine Maxwell. She further uses the testimony of Carolyn's boyfriend, Shawn, to contradict Carolyn's story regarding timelines, drug use, and who was calling their shared phone.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Claimant |
A person who claims Ghislaine Maxwell contacted her. Her testimony and credibility are being challenged.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Subject |
Referred to as "Ghislaine" and "Maxwell." Carolyn claims Ghislaine called and sent her things.
|
| Epstein | Associate |
Mentioned in connection with Ghislaine and as a potential caller to a phone shared by Carolyn and Shawn.
|
| Evelyn |
Mentioned as the person who was taking messages for Carolyn.
|
|
| Shawn | Witness/Boyfriend |
Carolyn's boyfriend, who testified about their visits, drug use, and phone calls, contradicting Carolyn's story.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Caller |
Identified by Shawn as one of the people who would call the phone he shared with Carolyn.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FedEx | company |
Mentioned as a delivery service for which there are no records of Ghislaine sending things to Carolyn.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
"It would either be Epstein or Sarah Kellen calling;"Source
"Correct. Yes."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,514 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document